INTRODUCTION: This study describes the characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in HIV-positive patients in the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs study and discusses the impact of different methodological approaches on estimates of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome over time. METHODS: We described the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients under follow-up at the end of six calendar periods from 2000 to 2007. The definition that was used for the metabolic syndrome was modified to take account of the use of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medication, measurement variability and missing values, and assessed the impact of these modifications on the estimated prevalence. RESULTS: For all definitions considered, there was an increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome over time, although the prevalence estimates themselves varied widely. Using our primary definition, we found an increase in prevalence from 19.4% in 2000/2001 to 41.6% in 2006/2007. Modification of the definition to incorporate antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medication had relatively little impact on the prevalence estimates, as did modification to allow for missing data. In contrast, modification to allow the metabolic syndrome to be reversible and to allow for measurement variability lowered prevalence estimates substantially. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in cohort studies is largely based on the use of nonstandardized measurements as they are captured in daily clinical care. As a result, bias is easily introduced, particularly when measurements are both highly variable and may be missing. We suggest that the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in cohort studies should be based on two consecutive measurements of the laboratory components in the syndrome definition.
INTRODUCTION: This study describes the characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in HIV-positivepatients in the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs study and discusses the impact of different methodological approaches on estimates of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome over time. METHODS: We described the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients under follow-up at the end of six calendar periods from 2000 to 2007. The definition that was used for the metabolic syndrome was modified to take account of the use of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medication, measurement variability and missing values, and assessed the impact of these modifications on the estimated prevalence. RESULTS: For all definitions considered, there was an increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome over time, although the prevalence estimates themselves varied widely. Using our primary definition, we found an increase in prevalence from 19.4% in 2000/2001 to 41.6% in 2006/2007. Modification of the definition to incorporate antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medication had relatively little impact on the prevalence estimates, as did modification to allow for missing data. In contrast, modification to allow the metabolic syndrome to be reversible and to allow for measurement variability lowered prevalence estimates substantially. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in cohort studies is largely based on the use of nonstandardized measurements as they are captured in daily clinical care. As a result, bias is easily introduced, particularly when measurements are both highly variable and may be missing. We suggest that the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in cohort studies should be based on two consecutive measurements of the laboratory components in the syndrome definition.
Authors: John R Koethe; Aihua Bian; Ayumi K Shintani; M Sean Boger; Valerie J Mitchell; Husamettin Erdem; Todd Hulgan Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Suad Kapetanovic; Lisa Aaron; Paige L Williams; John Farley; Patricia A Sirois; Patricia A Garvie; Deborah A Pearson; James M Oleske; Grace Montepiedra Journal: Neurobehav HIV Med Date: 2010-08
Authors: Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Lumine H Na; Raphael J Landovitz; Heather J Ribaudo; Grace A McComsey; Catherine Godfrey; Francesca Aweeka; Susan E Cohn; Manish Sagar; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Todd T Brown; Kristine B Patterson; Michael F Para; Randi Y Leavitt; Angelina Villasis-Keever; Bryan P Baugh; Jeffrey L Lennox; Judith S Currier Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Colleen Hadigan; Elizabeth Edwards; Alice Rosenberg; Julia B Purdy; Estee Fleischman; Lilian Howard; JoAnn M Mican; Karmini Sampath; Akinbowale Oyalowo; Antoinette Johnson; Alexandra Adler; Catherine Rehm; Margo Smith; Leon Lai; Jeffrey B Kopp Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2013-04-20 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Alex K Bryant; Pariya L Fazeli; Scott L Letendre; Ronald J Ellis; Michael Potter; Tricia H Burdo; Kumud K Singh; Dilip V Jeste; Igor Grant; David J Moore Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 2.205