Literature DB >> 19910566

Biocompatibility and tolerability of a purely bicarbonate-buffered peritoneal dialysis solution.

Lars Weiss1, Bernd Stegmayr, Gudrun Malmsten, Mattias Tejde, Henrik Hadimeri, Carl E Siegert, Jarl Ahlmén, Rutger Larsson, Bo Ingman, Ole Simonsen, Henk W van Hamersvelt, Ann C Johansson, Britta Hylander, Michael Mayr, Per-Henrik Nilsson, Per O Andersson, Tatiana De los Ríos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel peritoneal dialysis solutions are characterized by a minimal content of glucose degradation products and a neutral pH. Many studies have shown the biocompatibility of neutral lactate-buffered solutions; however, until now, the effect of purely bicarbonate-buffered solutions has not been intensively studied in vivo.
METHODS: This study was an open label, prospective, crossover multicenter trial to investigate the biocompatibility of a purely bicarbonate-buffered solution (bicPDF) by measuring biocompatibility parameters such as cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in peritoneal effluent. 55 patients were enrolled in the study. After a 2-week run-in phase, 53 patients could be randomized into 2 groups, starting with either standard lactate-buffered peritoneal dialysis fluid (SPDF) for 12 weeks (phase 1) and then switching to bicPDF for 12 weeks (phase 2), or vice versa. Overnight peritoneal effluents were collected at baseline and at the end of phases 1 and 2 and were tested for CA125, hyaluronic acid, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interferon gamma (IFNgamma), and transforming growth factor-beta(1) (TGF-beta1). Total ultrafiltration and residual renal function were also assessed. At the end of the study, pain during fluid exchange and dwell was evaluated using special questionnaires.
RESULTS: 34 patients completed the study; 27 of them provided data for analysis of the biocompatibility parameters. CA125 levels in overnight effluent were significantly higher with bicPDF (61.9 +/- 33.2 U/L) than with SPDF (18.6 +/- 18.2 U/L, p < 0.001). Hyaluronic acid levels were significantly lower after the use of bicPDF (185.0 +/- 119.6 ng/mL) than after SPDF (257.4 +/- 174.0 ng/mL, p = 0.013). Both TNF-alpha and TGF-beta1 showed higher levels with the use of bicPDF than with SPDF. No differences were observed for IL-6, VEGF, or IFNgamma levels. We observed an improvement in the glomerular filtration rate with the use of bicPDF but no differences were observed for total fluid loss. Pain scores could be analyzed in 23 patients: there was no difference between the solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a purely bicarbonate-buffered low-glucose degradation product solution significantly changes most of the peritoneal effluent markers measured, suggesting an improvement in peritoneal membrane integrity. Additionally, it seems to have a positive effect on residual renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  19 in total

1.  Trials (and tribulations) of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids.

Authors:  David W Johnson; Yeoungjee Cho; Fiona G Brown
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Intraperitoneal IL-6 signaling in incident patients treated with icodextrin and glucose bicarbonate/lactate-based peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Sylvie Opatrna; Daniel Lysak; Ladislav Trefil; Clare Parker; Nicholas Topley
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Effect of Neutral-pH, Low-Glucose Degradation Product Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on Residual Renal Function, Urine Volume, and Ultrafiltration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seychelle Yohanna; Ali M A Alkatheeri; Scott K Brimble; Brendan McCormick; Arthur Iansavitchous; Peter G Blake; Arsh K Jain
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Increasing the use of biocompatible, glucose-free peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Ahad Qayyum; Elizabeth Ley Oei; Klara Paudel; Stanley L Fan
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

5.  Effects of biocompatible versus standard fluid on peritoneal dialysis outcomes.

Authors:  David W Johnson; Fiona G Brown; Margaret Clarke; Neil Boudville; Tony J Elias; Marjorie W Y Foo; Bernard Jones; Hemant Kulkarni; Robyn Langham; Dwarakanathan Ranganathan; John Schollum; Michael Suranyi; Seng H Tan; David Voss
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Balance about balANZ.

Authors:  Peter G Blake
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 7.  Effect of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis solution on residual renal function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eun-Young Seo; Sook Hee An; Jang-Hee Cho; Hae Sun Suh; Sun-Hee Park; Hyesun Gwak; Yong-Lim Kim; Hunjoo Ha
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Solutions for peritoneal dialysis in children: recommendations by the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group.

Authors:  Claus Peter Schmitt; Sevcan A Bakkaloglu; Günter Klaus; Cornelis Schröder; Michel Fischbach
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  The effects of biocompatible compared with standard peritoneal dialysis solutions on peritonitis microbiology, treatment, and outcomes: the balANZ trial.

Authors:  David W Johnson; Fiona G Brown; Margaret Clarke; Neil Boudville; Tony J Elias; Marjorie W Y Foo; Bernard Jones; Hemant Kulkarni; Robyn Langham; Dwarakanathan Ranganathan; John Schollum; Michael G Suranyi; Seng H Tan; David Voss
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  A study of the clinical and biochemical profile of peritoneal dialysis fluid low in glucose degradation products.

Authors:  Kar Neng Lai; Man Fai Lam; Joseph C K Leung; Loretta Y Chan; Christopher W K Lam; Iris H S Chan; Hoi Wong Chan; Chun Sang Li; Sunny S H Wong; Yiu Wing Ho; Au Cheuk; Matthew K L Tong; Sydney C W Tang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.