AIMS: It is unclear how the amplitude of bipolar electrogram relates to the local conduction velocity (CV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For 50 AF patients (paroxysmal/persistent AF: 40/10 patients), contact bipolar voltage maps of the left atrium (LA) were constructed during sinus rhythm using EnSite version 6.0J in a point-by-point recording fashion. Patients were divided into Groups A (n = 16), B (n = 19), and C (n = 15) according to the level of the lowest electrogram amplitudes: <0.5, 0.5-0.75, and 0.75-1.0 mV, respectively. Low-voltage zone (LVZ) was defined separately for these groups as a bipolar electrogram amplitude of <0.5, 0.5-0.75, and 0.75-1.0 mV, respectively. The local CV through the LVZ and non-LVZ was calculated along the direction of local activation within each zone for all groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: Low-voltage zone was consistently found at the septal, anterior, and posterior LA in all groups. In Group A, CV through the LVZ was significantly slower compared with the non-LVZ (0.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.6 m/s, P = 0.004), but those through the LVZ and non-LVZ were similar in Group B (1.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5 m/s, P = 0.07) and Group C (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.6 m/s, P = 0.79). The percentage of points showing fractionated or double potentials in the LVZ was significantly more in Group A (76/293 points, 26%) than in Group B (11/185 points, 6%), and Group C (7/135 points, 5%) (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was a significant slowing of local conduction in the LVZ defined as <0.5 mV and was frequently associated with fractionated or double potentials in patients with AF.
AIMS: It is unclear how the amplitude of bipolar electrogram relates to the local conduction velocity (CV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For 50 AFpatients (paroxysmal/persistent AF: 40/10 patients), contact bipolar voltage maps of the left atrium (LA) were constructed during sinus rhythm using EnSite version 6.0J in a point-by-point recording fashion. Patients were divided into Groups A (n = 16), B (n = 19), and C (n = 15) according to the level of the lowest electrogram amplitudes: <0.5, 0.5-0.75, and 0.75-1.0 mV, respectively. Low-voltage zone (LVZ) was defined separately for these groups as a bipolar electrogram amplitude of <0.5, 0.5-0.75, and 0.75-1.0 mV, respectively. The local CV through the LVZ and non-LVZ was calculated along the direction of local activation within each zone for all groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: Low-voltage zone was consistently found at the septal, anterior, and posterior LA in all groups. In Group A, CV through the LVZ was significantly slower compared with the non-LVZ (0.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.6 m/s, P = 0.004), but those through the LVZ and non-LVZ were similar in Group B (1.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5 m/s, P = 0.07) and Group C (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.6 m/s, P = 0.79). The percentage of points showing fractionated or double potentials in the LVZ was significantly more in Group A (76/293 points, 26%) than in Group B (11/185 points, 6%), and Group C (7/135 points, 5%) (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was a significant slowing of local conduction in the LVZ defined as <0.5 mV and was frequently associated with fractionated or double potentials in patients with AF.
Authors: Kotaro Fukumoto; Mohammadali Habibi; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Sohail Zahid; Irfan M Khurram; Stefan L Zimmerman; Vadim Zipunnikov; David Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Natalia Trayanova; Gordon F Tomaselli; John Rickard; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-03
Authors: Tuna Ustunkaya; Benoit Desjardins; Riley Wedan; C Anwar A Chahal; Stefan L Zimmerman; Nissi Saju; Sohail Zahid; Apurva Sharma; Yuchi Han; Natalia Trayanova; Francis E Marchlinski; Hugh Calkins; Harikrishna Tandri; Saman Nazarian Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-08-28
Authors: Tarek Zghaib; Ali Keramati; Jonathan Chrispin; Dong Huang; Muhammad A Balouch; Luisa Ciuffo; Ronald D Berger; Joseph E Marine; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian; David D Spragg Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-12-20
Authors: Carlos Sánchez; Alberto Corrias; Alfonso Bueno-Orovio; Mark Davies; Jonathan Swinton; Ingemar Jacobson; Pablo Laguna; Esther Pueyo; Blanca Rodríguez Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 4.733