Literature DB >> 19910208

A comparison of bone reconstruction following application of bone matrix gelatin and autogenous bone grafts to alveolar defects: an animal study.

Mohammad Bayat1, Fatemeh Momen-Heravi, Mehdi Marjani, Pouria Motahhary.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the quantity and quality of osseous healing of bone matrix gelatin (BMG) with autogenous bone graft (ABG) in cat models. Osseous defects (5 x 5mm) were made through upper alveolar bone distal to the canines in the left and right quadrants (maxilla) in each of twelve Persian male cats and filled randomly with BMG and ABG. The repair response was examined on days 14, 28, and 56 after surgery (n=4 per bone substitute per time point). Qualitative histological and quantitative histometric analysis including percentage of new formed bone fill (BF) and density were done. The inter-treatment comparison of mean levels of BF at specific time points showed consistently greater levels within BMG treated defects and reached significance on days 14, 28, and 56 (P<0.05). Regarding bone density (BD), there was no significant difference between BMG and ABG on days 14 and 28 (P>0.05). On day 56, BD was significantly higher within BMG group (P<0.05). Intra-treatment evaluation of bone formation in each group showed that BD significantly increased during treatment (P<0.05), and BF in BMG group reached significance at every time point but in ABG group only increase from day 28 to 56 reached significance (P<0. 05). Our results support the use of BMG to treat bone defects. Clinicians might expect better clinical outcomes without the possibility of side effects and morbidity associated with the harvest of autogenous bone. Copyright (c) 2009 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910208     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  Effects of bone regeneration materials and tooth movement timing on canine experimental orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ferdinand Mabula Machibya; Yiyuan Zhuang; Weizhong Guo; Dongdong You; Shan Lin; Dong Wu; Jiang Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Histomorphometric Analysis of Newly-formed Bone Using Octacalcium Phosphate and Bone Matrix Gelatin in Rat Tibial Defects.

Authors:  Fereydoon Sargolzaei Aval; Mohammad R Arab; Narjes Sargolzaei; Sanam Barfrushan; Mohsen Mir; Gholam H Sargazi; Forough Sargolzaeiaval; Maryam Arab
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

3.  In the Eye of the Beholder: Owner Preferences for Variations in Cats' Appearances with Specific Focus on Skull Morphology.

Authors:  Mark J Farnworth; Rowena M A Packer; Lorena Sordo; Ruoning Chen; Sarah M A Caney; Danièlle A Gunn-Moore
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Reconstruction of mandibular defects using synthetic octacalcium phosphate combined with bone matrix gelatin in rat model.

Authors:  Fereydoon Sargolzaei-Aval; Eshagh Ali Saberi; Mohammad Reza Arab; Narjes Sargolzaei; Esmaeel Zare; Heshmatollah Shahraki; Tayebeh Sanchooli; Forough Sargolzaeiaval; Maryam Arab
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-01-21

5.  Bone Reconstruction following Application of Bone Matrix Gelatin to Alveolar Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  M Bayat; F Momen Heravi; M Mahmoudi; N Bahrami
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 6.  Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.

Authors:  J Girón; E Kerstner; T Medeiros; L Oliveira; G M Machado; C F Malfatti; P Pranke
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.590

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.