Literature DB >> 19908385

Enabling personal genomics with an explicit test of epistasis.

Casey S Greene1, Daniel S Himmelstein, Heather H Nelson, Karl T Kelsey, Scott M Williams, Angeline S Andrew, Margaret R Karagas, Jason H Moore.   

Abstract

One goal of personal genomics is to use information about genomic variation to predict who is at risk for various common diseases. Technological advances in genotyping have spawned several personal genetic testing services that market genotyping services directly to the consumer. An important goal of consumer genetic testing is to provide health information along with the genotyping results. This has the potential to integrate detailed personal genetic and genomic information into healthcare decision making. Despite the potential importance of these advances, there are some important limitations. One concern is that much of the literature that is used to formulate personal genetics reports is based on genetic association studies that consider each genetic variant independently of the others. It is our working hypothesis that the true value of personal genomics will only be realized when the complexity of the genotype-to-phenotype mapping relationship is embraced, rather than ignored. We focus here on complexity in genetic architecture due to epistasis or nonlinear gene-gene interaction. We have previously developed a multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) algorithm and software package for detecting nonlinear interactions in genetic association studies. In most prior MDR analyses, the permutation testing strategy used to assess statistical significance was unable to differentiate MDR models that captured only interaction effects from those that also detected independent main effects. Statistical interpretation of MDR models required post-hoc analysis using entropy-based measures of interaction information. We introduce here a novel permutation test that allows the effects of nonlinear interactions between multiple genetic variants to be specifically tested in a manner that is not confounded by linear additive effects. We show using simulated nonlinear interactions that the power using the explicit test of epistasis is no different than a standard permutation test. We also show that the test has the appropriate size or type I error rate of approximately 0.05. We then apply MDR with the new explicit test of epistasis to a large genetic study of bladder cancer and show that a previously reported nonlinear interaction between is indeed significant, even after considering the strong additive effect of smoking in the model. Finally, we evaluated the power of the explicit test of epistasis to detect the nonlinear interaction between two XPD gene polymorphisms by simulating data from the MDR model of bladder cancer susceptibility. The results of this study provide for the first time a simple method for explicitly testing epistasis or gene-gene interaction effects in genetic association studies. Although we demonstrated the method with MDR, an important advantage is that it can be combined with any modeling approach. The explicit test of epistasis brings us a step closer to the type of routine gene-gene interaction analysis that is needed if we are to enable personal genomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19908385      PMCID: PMC2916690          DOI: 10.1142/9789814295291_0035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  33 in total

1.  Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Marylyn D Ritchie; Lance W Hahn; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 2.  Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  New strategies for identifying gene-gene interactions in hypertension.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 4.  Determinants of the success of whole-genome association testing.

Authors:  Andrew G Clark; Eric Boerwinkle; James Hixson; Charles F Sing
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns.

Authors:  William Y S Wang; Bryan J Barratt; David G Clayton; John A Todd
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Traversing the conceptual divide between biological and statistical epistasis: systems biology and a more modern synthesis.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Commentary: statistical analysis or biological analysis as tools for understanding biological causes.

Authors:  R C Lewontin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  A balanced accuracy function for epistasis modeling in imbalanced datasets using multifactor dimensionality reduction.

Authors:  Digna R Velez; Bill C White; Alison A Motsinger; William S Bush; Marylyn D Ritchie; Scott M Williams; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 10.  Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  28 in total

1.  A simple and computationally efficient sampling approach to covariate adjustment for multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of epistasis.

Authors:  Jiang Gui; Angeline S Andrew; Peter Andrews; Heather M Nelson; Karl T Kelsey; Margaret R Karagas; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  A robust multifactor dimensionality reduction method for detecting gene-gene interactions with application to the genetic analysis of bladder cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Jiang Gui; Angeline S Andrew; Peter Andrews; Heather M Nelson; Karl T Kelsey; Margaret R Karagas; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Analysis of gene-gene interactions.

Authors:  Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07

4.  Confronting the missing epistasis problem: on the reproducibility of gene-gene interactions.

Authors:  William Murk; Michael B Bracken; Andrew T DeWan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Identification of SNPs associated with variola virus virulence.

Authors:  Anne Gatewood Hoen; Shea N Gardner; Jason H Moore
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.522

6.  Genes in the insulin and insulin-like growth factor pathway and odds of metachronous colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Elizabeth C LeRoy; Jason H Moore; Chengcheng Hu; María Elena Martínez; Peter Lance; David Duggan; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Importance measures for epistatic interactions in case-parent trios.

Authors:  Holger Schwender; Katherine Bowers; M Daniele Fallin; Ingo Ruczinski
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 8.  Using biological knowledge to uncover the mystery in the search for epistasis in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Multi-variant study of obesity risk genes in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Shijian Liu; James G Wilson; Fan Jiang; Michael Griswold; Adolfo Correa; Hao Mei
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 10.  Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Folkert W Asselbergs; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.