Mark Haas1. 1. Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA. mark.haas@cshs.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: C4d deposition within peritubular capillaries (PTCs) in renal allograft biopsies is a specific marker for interaction of antibody with the graft, and is an extremely useful tool for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Whereas PTC C4d itself is not diagnostic of AMR, it is usually accompanied by histologic features of acute and/or chronic AMR. However, some biopsies, mainly from ABO-incompatible renal allografts, show C4d staining without histologic findings of AMR or cell-mediated rejection. The significance of such C4d staining remains a topic of debate, and this finding may have different implications in ABO-incompatible versus conventional renal allografts. RECENT FINDINGS: In biopsies of ABO-incompatible renal allografts (particularly protocol biopsies), C4d deposition in the absence of histologic evidence of rejection is a common finding, is not associated with an increased risk of graft scarring, and may even indicate a decreased risk of scarring, at least in the short term. By contrast, in positive cross-match and conventional renal allografts such C4d deposition is uncommon, and may indicate potentially reversible graft injury. However, a state of C4d staining without associated graft injury may be inducible in positive cross-match grafts by complement inhibition. SUMMARY: C4d staining without associated histologic findings of rejection may represent a marker for stable graft accommodation, at least in ABO-incompatible renal allografts. However, further studies are clearly needed to determine what the long-term implications of such C4d deposition are.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: C4d deposition within peritubular capillaries (PTCs) in renal allograft biopsies is a specific marker for interaction of antibody with the graft, and is an extremely useful tool for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Whereas PTC C4d itself is not diagnostic of AMR, it is usually accompanied by histologic features of acute and/or chronic AMR. However, some biopsies, mainly from ABO-incompatible renal allografts, show C4d staining without histologic findings of AMR or cell-mediated rejection. The significance of such C4d staining remains a topic of debate, and this finding may have different implications in ABO-incompatible versus conventional renal allografts. RECENT FINDINGS: In biopsies of ABO-incompatible renal allografts (particularly protocol biopsies), C4d deposition in the absence of histologic evidence of rejection is a common finding, is not associated with an increased risk of graft scarring, and may even indicate a decreased risk of scarring, at least in the short term. By contrast, in positive cross-match and conventional renal allografts such C4d deposition is uncommon, and may indicate potentially reversible graft injury. However, a state of C4d staining without associated graft injury may be inducible in positive cross-match grafts by complement inhibition. SUMMARY: C4d staining without associated histologic findings of rejection may represent a marker for stable graft accommodation, at least in ABO-incompatible renal allografts. However, further studies are clearly needed to determine what the long-term implications of such C4d deposition are.
Authors: Anthony Chang; Jocelyn M Moore; Michelle L Cowan; Michelle A Josephson; W James Chon; Roger Sciammas; Zeying Du; Susana R Marino; Shane M Meehan; Michael Millis; Michael Z David; James W Williams; Anita S Chong Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Danielle Cohen; Robert B Colvin; Mohamed R Daha; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Mark Haas; Volker Nickeleit; Jane E Salmon; Banu Sis; Ming-Hui Zhao; Jan A Bruijn; Ingeborg M Bajema Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Željko Kikić; Alexander Kainz; Nicolas Kozakowski; Rainer Oberbauer; Heinz Regele; Gregor Bond; Georg A Böhmig Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Anjali B Nayak; Robert B Ettenger; Suzanne McGuire; Gerald S Lipshutz; Elaine F Reed; Jeffrey Veale; Eileen W Tsai Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2015-03-08 Impact factor: 3.714