Carlos G Grijalva1, Lisa Kaltenbach, Patrick G Arbogast, Edward F Mitchel, Marie R Griffin. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1500 21st Avenue Suite 2600, The Village at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN 37232-2637, USA. carlos.grijalva@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In clinical trials of RA patients on traditional DMARDs, the addition of TNF-alpha antagonists increased infections compared with addition of placebo. Our objective was to compare serious infections following initiation of different RA regimens. Prior comparative studies of DMARD initiation have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: We estimated hospitalization rates for infections following initiation of TNF-alpha antagonists, other DMARDs and oral glucocorticoids in Tennessee Medicaid-enrolled RA patients (1995-2005). Exposure time was measured using pharmacy information and infections were identified using validated definitions. Initiation of RA regimens was compared using Cox regression models with MTX as the reference. Sensitivity analyses excluded glucocorticoid users, applied a first exposure carried forward approach, restricted observations to 2002-05 and first episodes of use and explored effects of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: We identified 28 906 new episodes of medication use, including TNF-alpha antagonists (8%), MTX alone (15%) and glucocorticoids alone (57%). Compared with MTX initiation, TNF-alpha antagonist initiation did not significantly increase the risk of hospitalizations for pneumonia [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.61; 95% CI 0.85, 3.03] or any infection (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 0.78, 2.19). Initiation of LEF, SSZ or HCQ did not increase serious infections, compared with MTX. Both initiation and concurrent glucocorticoid use were associated with a dose-dependent increase in serious infections. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with initiation of MTX alone, initiation of TNF-alpha antagonists was not associated with a large increase in the risk of serious infections. Glucocorticoid use was associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of these infections.
OBJECTIVE: In clinical trials of RApatients on traditional DMARDs, the addition of TNF-alpha antagonists increased infections compared with addition of placebo. Our objective was to compare serious infections following initiation of different RA regimens. Prior comparative studies of DMARD initiation have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: We estimated hospitalization rates for infections following initiation of TNF-alpha antagonists, other DMARDs and oral glucocorticoids in Tennessee Medicaid-enrolled RApatients (1995-2005). Exposure time was measured using pharmacy information and infections were identified using validated definitions. Initiation of RA regimens was compared using Cox regression models with MTX as the reference. Sensitivity analyses excluded glucocorticoid users, applied a first exposure carried forward approach, restricted observations to 2002-05 and first episodes of use and explored effects of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: We identified 28 906 new episodes of medication use, including TNF-alpha antagonists (8%), MTX alone (15%) and glucocorticoids alone (57%). Compared with MTX initiation, TNF-alpha antagonist initiation did not significantly increase the risk of hospitalizations for pneumonia [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.61; 95% CI 0.85, 3.03] or any infection (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 0.78, 2.19). Initiation of LEF, SSZ or HCQ did not increase serious infections, compared with MTX. Both initiation and concurrent glucocorticoid use were associated with a dose-dependent increase in serious infections. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with initiation of MTX alone, initiation of TNF-alpha antagonists was not associated with a large increase in the risk of serious infections. Glucocorticoid use was associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of these infections.
Authors: F Buttgereit; J A P da Silva; M Boers; G-R Burmester; M Cutolo; J Jacobs; J Kirwan; L Köhler; P Van Riel; T Vischer; J W J Bijlsma Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Suzanne M Cadarette; Jeffrey N Katz; M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer; Margaret R Stedman; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carlos G Grijalva; Cecilia P Chung; C Michael Stein; Patricia S Gideon; Shannon M Dyer; Edward F Mitchel; Marie R Griffin Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Andrew D Wiese; Marie R Griffin; William Schaffner; C Michael Stein; Robert A Greevy; Edward F Mitchel; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Carlos G Grijalva; Lang Chen; Elizabeth Delzell; John W Baddley; Timothy Beukelman; Kevin L Winthrop; Marie R Griffin; Lisa J Herrinton; Liyan Liu; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Nivedita M Patkar; Daniel H Solomon; James D Lewis; Fenglong Xie; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Pradeep Sharma; Tarun Arora; Aseem Bharat; Itara Barnes; Michael A Morrisey; Meredith Kilgore; Kenneth G Saag; Nicole C Wright; Huifen G Yun; Elizabeth Delzell Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: James B Galloway; Kimme L Hyrich; Louise K Mercer; William G Dixon; Bo Fu; Andrew P Ustianowski; Kath D Watson; Mark Lunt; Deborah P M Symmons Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 7.580