Literature DB >> 19906782

Genome-wide association studies in cancer--current and future directions.

Charles C Chung1, Wagner C S Magalhaes, Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet, Stephen J Chanock.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have emerged as an important tool for discovering regions of the genome that harbor genetic variants that confer risk for different types of cancers. The success of GWAS in the last 3 years is due to the convergence of new technologies that can genotype hundreds of thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphism markers together with comprehensive annotation of genetic variation. This approach has provided the opportunity to scan across the genome in a sufficiently large set of cases and controls without a set of prior hypotheses in search of susceptibility alleles with low effect sizes. Generally, the susceptibility alleles discovered thus far are common, namely, with a frequency in one or more population of >10% and each allele confers a small contribution to the overall risk for the disease. For nearly all regions conclusively identified by GWAS, the per allele effect sizes estimated are <1.3. Consequently, the findings of GWAS underscore the complex nature of cancer and have focused attention on a subset of the genetic variants that comprise the genomic architecture of each type of cancer, which already can differ substantially by the number of regions associated with specific types of cancer. For instance, in prostate cancer, there could be >30 distinct regions harboring common susceptibility alleles identified by GWAS, whereas in lung cancer, a disease strongly driven by exposure to tobacco products, so far, only three regions have been conclusively established. To date, >85 regions have been conclusively associated in over a dozen different cancers, yet no more than five regions have been associated with more than one distinct cancer type. GWAS are an important discovery tool that require extensive follow-up to map each region, investigate the biological mechanism underpinning the association and eventually test the optimal markers for assessing risk for a disease or its outcome, such as in pharmacogenomics, the study of the effect of genetic variation on pharmacological interventions. The success of GWAS has opened new horizons for exploration and highlighted the complex genomic architecture of disease susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906782      PMCID: PMC2860704          DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgp273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  149 in total

1.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations.

Authors:  Laufey T Amundadottir; Patrick Sulem; Julius Gudmundsson; Agnar Helgason; Adam Baker; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Jesus Sainz; Margret Jakobsdottir; Jelena Kostic; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Shyamali Ghosh; Kari Agnarsson; Birgitta Birgisdottir; Louise Le Roux; Adalheidur Olafsdottir; Thorarinn Blondal; Margret Andresdottir; Olafia Svandis Gretarsdottir; Jon T Bergthorsson; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Arnaldur Gylfason; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Andrei Manolescu; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Gudmundur Geirsson; Helgi Isaksson; Julie Douglas; Jan-Erik Johansson; Katarina Bälter; Fredrik Wiklund; James E Montie; Xiaoying Yu; Brian K Suarez; Carole Ober; Kathleen A Cooney; Henrik Gronberg; William J Catalona; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Comparison of gene expression and DNA copy number changes in a murine model of lung cancer.

Authors:  Alejandro Sweet-Cordero; George C Tseng; Han You; Margaret Douglass; Bing Huey; Donna Albertson; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Automating sequence-based detection and genotyping of SNPs from diploid samples.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; James S Sloan; P D Robertson; Paul Scheet; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Genetic variation in TNF and IL10 and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the InterLymph Consortium.

Authors:  Nathaniel Rothman; Christine F Skibola; Sophia S Wang; Gareth Morgan; Qing Lan; Martyn T Smith; John J Spinelli; Eleanor Willett; Silvia De Sanjose; Pierluigi Cocco; Sonja I Berndt; Paul Brennan; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Sholom Wacholder; Nikolaus Becker; Patricia Hartge; Tongzhang Zheng; Eve Roman; Elizabeth A Holly; Paolo Boffetta; Bruce Armstrong; Wendy Cozen; Martha Linet; F Xavier Bosch; Maria Grazia Ennas; Theodore R Holford; Richard P Gallagher; Sara Rollinson; Paige M Bracci; James R Cerhan; Denise Whitby; Patrick S Moore; Brian Leaderer; Agnes Lai; Charlotte Spink; Scott Davis; Ramon Bosch; Aldo Scarpa; Yawei Zhang; Richard K Severson; Meredith Yeager; Stephen Chanock; Alexandra Nieters
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Genetic alterations in urothelial bladder carcinoma: an updated review.

Authors:  Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia; Richard T Cheney; Juerg Schwaller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  SNP500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation, assay development, and frequency analysis for genetic variation in candidate genes.

Authors:  Bernice R Packer; Meredith Yeager; Laura Burdett; Robert Welch; Michael Beerman; Liqun Qi; Hugues Sicotte; Brian Staats; Mekhala Acharya; Andrew Crenshaw; Andrew Eckert; Vinita Puri; Daniela S Gerhard; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A comprehensive resequence analysis of the KLK15-KLK3-KLK2 locus on chromosome 19q13.33.

Authors:  Hemang Parikh; Zuoming Deng; Meredith Yeager; Joseph Boland; Casey Matthews; Jinping Jia; Irene Collins; Ariel White; Laura Burdett; Amy Hutchinson; Liqun Qi; Jennifer A Bacior; Victor Lonsberry; Matthew J Rodesch; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Thomas J Albert; Heather A Halvensleben; Timothy T Harkins; Jiyoung Ahn; Sonja I Berndt; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Robert Hoover; Gilles Thomas; David J Hunter; Richard B Hayes; Stephen J Chanock; Laufey Amundadottir
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  A spectrum of severe familial liver disorders associate with telomerase mutations.

Authors:  Rodrigo T Calado; Joshua A Regal; David E Kleiner; David S Schrump; Nathan R Peterson; Veronica Pons; Stephen J Chanock; Peter M Lansdorp; Neal S Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comprehensive resequence analysis of a 97 kb region of chromosome 10q11.2 containing the MSMB gene associated with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Meredith Yeager; Zuoming Deng; Joseph Boland; Casey Matthews; Jennifer Bacior; Victor Lonsberry; Amy Hutchinson; Laura A Burdett; Liqun Qi; Kevin B Jacobs; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Sonja I Berndt; Richard B Hayes; Robert N Hoover; Gilles Thomas; David J Hunter; Michael Dean; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Genetic predisposition factors and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a review of epidemiological association studies, 2000-2011: Rosetta Stone for NPC: genetics, viral infection, and other environmental factors.

Authors:  Allan Hildesheim; Cheng-Ping Wang
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  A subset-based approach improves power and interpretation for the combined analysis of genetic association studies of heterogeneous traits.

Authors:  Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee; Preetha Rajaraman; Kevin B Jacobs; William A Wheeler; Beatrice S Melin; Patricia Hartge; Meredith Yeager; Charles C Chung; Stephen J Chanock; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Implications of genome-wide association studies in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Jai N Patel; Howard L McLeod; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A step toward slaying the hydra of second cancers.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Glutathione S-Transferase P1 313 (A > G) Ile105Val Polymorphism Contributes to Cancer Susceptibility in Indian Population: A Meta-analysis of 39 Case-Control Studies.

Authors:  Raju K Mandal; Rama D Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2018-09-17

6.  Identification of a shared protective genetic susceptibility locus for colorectal cancer and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Na He; Lijun Liu; Xianglong Duan; Li Wang; Dongya Yuan; Tianbo Jin; Longli Kang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-17

7.  Genetic Variant Arg399Gln G>A of XRCC1 DNA Repair Gene Enhanced Cancer Risk Among Indian Population: Evidence from Meta-analysis and Trial Sequence Analyses.

Authors:  Raju K Mandal; Rama D Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-07-10

8.  Enhancer scanning to locate regulatory regions in genomic loci.

Authors:  Melissa Buckley; Anxhela Gjyshi; Gustavo Mendoza-Fandiño; Rebekah Baskin; Renato S Carvalho; Marcelo A Carvalho; Nicholas T Woods; Alvaro N A Monteiro
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Exploration of the postponing mechanism that delays carcinoma onset.

Authors:  Chao-Nan Qian
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 5.722

10.  Polygenic susceptibility to prostate and breast cancer: implications for personalised screening.

Authors:  N Pashayan; S W Duffy; S Chowdhury; T Dent; H Burton; D E Neal; D F Easton; R Eeles; P Pharoah
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.