OBJECTIVES: Although physician- and patient-rated diagnoses of lipoatrophy are currently used as a basis for inclusion into clinical trials, few studies have compared physician- or patient-rated lipoatrophy severity with objective measures. We aim to assess the validity of physician- and patient-rated diagnoses of lipoatrophy by evaluating the correlation between clinical assessments of lipoatrophy and objective fat indices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the association between clinical lipoatrophy scores and DEXA-measured limb fat (n = 154) and subcutaneous fat mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels (n = 80) in HIV+ individuals. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between DEXA-measured limb fat and lipoatrophy scores generated by either the patients (r = -0.27, p = .008) or the physician (r = -0.48, p < .0001). Also, a significant positive correlation was found between the patient-generated lipoatrophy score and the physician score (r = 0.68, p < .0001). However, there was no correlation between fat mtDNA levels and DEXA-measured limb fat (r = -0.09, p = .42) or between physician- or patient-generated lipoatrophy scores (r = -0.09, p = .43, and r = 0.04, p = .71, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that physician- and patient-rated lipoatrophy scores may be useful surrogates for more expensive measures of lipoatrophy, which could be reserved for research studies.
OBJECTIVES: Although physician- and patient-rated diagnoses of lipoatrophy are currently used as a basis for inclusion into clinical trials, few studies have compared physician- or patient-rated lipoatrophy severity with objective measures. We aim to assess the validity of physician- and patient-rated diagnoses of lipoatrophy by evaluating the correlation between clinical assessments of lipoatrophy and objective fat indices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the association between clinical lipoatrophy scores and DEXA-measured limb fat (n = 154) and subcutaneous fat mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels (n = 80) in HIV+ individuals. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between DEXA-measured limb fat and lipoatrophy scores generated by either the patients (r = -0.27, p = .008) or the physician (r = -0.48, p < .0001). Also, a significant positive correlation was found between the patient-generated lipoatrophy score and the physician score (r = 0.68, p < .0001). However, there was no correlation between fat mtDNA levels and DEXA-measured limb fat (r = -0.09, p = .42) or between physician- or patient-generated lipoatrophy scores (r = -0.09, p = .43, and r = 0.04, p = .71, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that physician- and patient-rated lipoatrophy scores may be useful surrogates for more expensive measures of lipoatrophy, which could be reserved for research studies.
Authors: S Duran; M Savès; B Spire; V Cailleton; A Sobel; P Carrieri; D Salmon; J P Moatti; C Leport Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-12-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jennifer F Hoy; Michelle E Gahan; Andrew Carr; Don Smith; Sharon R Lewin; Steve Wesselingh; David A Cooper Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-07-12 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: K Mulligan; V W Tai; H Algren; D I Abrams; R J Leiser; J C Lo; M Schambelan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Andrew Carr; Cassy Workman; Don E Smith; Jennifer Hoy; Jeff Hudson; Nicholas Doong; Allison Martin; Janaki Amin; Judith Freund; Matthew Law; David A Cooper Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Grace A McComsey; Douglas J Ward; Siegrid M Hessenthaler; Michael G Sension; Peter Shalit; J Tyler Lonergan; Robin L Fisher; Vanessa C Williams; Jaime E Hernandez Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-12-18 Impact factor: 9.079