Literature DB >> 19906186

Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal.

A Magheli1, S Rais-Bahrami, C Kempkensteffen, W H Weiske, K Miller, S Hinz.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the obstructive interval and the presence of a sperm granuloma on vas patency and pregnancy rate following vasectomy reversal. We identified 334 patients with complete follow-up who met the inclusion criteria. There were significant associations between the obstructive interval and procedure performed as well as with patient age. Patients with longer obstructive intervals were more often older (p < 0.001) and more likely to have a vaseoepididymostomy performed (p < 0.001). There was no association between the presence of a sperm granuloma or the length of the obstructive interval with post-operative vas patency and pregnancy rates. The only independent predictor of post-operative fertility was age of the female partner (p = 0.015). Our data clearly demonstrates that when state of the art surgical techniques are used, neither the presence of a sperm granuloma nor the obstructive interval serve as prognosticators of post-operative vas patency and pregnancy rates. However, when counselling patients and their female partners, it is of utmost importance to stress that the age of the female partner is an independent predictor of successful vasectomy reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01007.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  7 in total

Review 1.  Microsurgical Management of Male Infertility: Compelling Evidence That Collaboration with Qualified Male Reproductive Urologists Enhances Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Marinaro; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Sperm granulomas: Predictive factors and impacts on patency post vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Mary K Samplaski; John C S Rodman; Jessica Michelle Perry; Matthew B F Marks; Robert Zollman; Kian Asanad; Sheldon F Marks
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.532

Review 3.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.

Authors:  Karen Baker; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  The need for epididymovasostomy at vasectomy reversal plateaus in older vasectomies: a study of 1229 cases.

Authors:  P Mui; A Perkins; P J Burrows; S F Marks; P J Turek
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 5.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Vasectomy reversal: decision making and technical innovations.

Authors:  E Will Kirby; Mark Hockenberry; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.