Literature DB >> 19906066

Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management.

Elise F Granek1, Stephen Polasky, Carrie V Kappel, Denise J Reed, David M Stoms, Evamaria W Koch, Chris J Kennedy, Lori A Cramer, Sally D Hacker, Edward B Barbier, Shankar Aswani, Mary Ruckelshaus, Gerardo M E Perillo, Brian R Silliman, Nyawira Muthiga, David Bael, Eric Wolanski.   

Abstract

Ecosystem-based management is logistically and politically challenging because ecosystems are inherently complex and management decisions affect a multitude of groups. Coastal ecosystems, which lie at the interface between marine and terrestrial ecosystems and provide an array of ecosystem services to different groups, aptly illustrate these challenges. Successful ecosystem-based management of coastal ecosystems requires incorporating scientific information and the knowledge and views of interested parties into the decision-making process. Estimating the provision of ecosystem services under alternative management schemes offers a systematic way to incorporate biogeophysical and socioeconomic information and the views of individuals and groups in the policy and management process. Employing ecosystem services as a common language to improve the process of ecosystem-based management presents both benefits and difficulties. Benefits include a transparent method for assessing trade-offs associated with management alternatives, a common set of facts and common currency on which to base negotiations, and improved communication among groups with competing interests or differing worldviews. Yet challenges to this approach remain, including predicting how human interventions will affect ecosystems, how such changes will affect the provision of ecosystem services, and how changes in service provision will affect the welfare of different groups in society. In a case study from Puget Sound, Washington, we illustrate the potential of applying ecosystem services as a common language for ecosystem-based management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906066     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01355.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

1.  Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Stephen Polasky; Heather Tallis; Belinda Reyers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Information Needs Assessment for Coastal and Marine Management and Policy: Ecosystem Services Under Changing Climatic, Land Use, and Demographic Conditions.

Authors:  Kaitlin A Goldsmith; Elise F Granek; Amy Lubitow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Characterizing Coastal Ecosystem Service Trade-offs with Future Urban Development in a Tropical City.

Authors:  Daniel R Richards; Daniel A Friess
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Valuing ecological systems and services.

Authors:  Robert Costanza; Ida Kubiszewski; David Ervin; Randy Bluffstone; James Boyd; Darrell Brown; Heejun Chang; Veronica Dujon; Elise Granek; Stephen Polasky; Vivek Shandas; Alan Yeakley
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2011-07-01

5.  Ecosystem Services Insights into Water Resources Management in China: A Case of Xi'an City.

Authors:  Jingya Liu; Jing Li; Ziyi Gao; Min Yang; Keyu Qin; Xiaonan Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Incorporating public priorities in the Ocean Health Index: Canada as a case study.

Authors:  Rémi M Daigle; Philippe Archambault; Benjamin S Halpern; Julia S Stewart Lowndes; Isabelle M Côté
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A protocol for identifying suitable biomarkers to assess fish health: A systematic review.

Authors:  Frederieke Kroon; Claire Streten; Simon Harries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Land use management based on multi-scenario allocation and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Wafangdian County, Liaoning Province, China.

Authors:  Wenzhen Zhao; Zenglin Han; Xiaolu Yan; Jingqiu Zhong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Exploring Biophysical Linkages between Coastal Forestry Management Practices and Aquatic Bivalve Contaminant Exposure.

Authors:  Kaegan Scully-Engelmeyer; Elise F Granek; Max Nielsen-Pincus; Andy Lanier; Steven S Rumrill; Patrick Moran; Elena Nilsen; Michelle L Hladik; Lori Pillsbury
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-03-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.