Literature DB >> 19905387

Quantifying the connectivity of a network: the network correlation function method.

Baruch Barzel1, Ofer Biham.   

Abstract

Networks are useful for describing systems of interacting objects, where the nodes represent the objects and the edges represent the interactions between them. The applications include chemical and metabolic systems, food webs as well as social networks. Lately, it was found that many of these networks display some common topological features, such as high clustering, small average path length (small-world networks), and a power-law degree distribution (scale-free networks). The topological features of a network are commonly related to the network's functionality. However, the topology alone does not account for the nature of the interactions in the network and their strength. Here, we present a method for evaluating the correlations between pairs of nodes in the network. These correlations depend both on the topology and on the functionality of the network. A network with high connectivity displays strong correlations between its interacting nodes and thus features small-world functionality. We quantify the correlations between all pairs of nodes in the network, and express them as matrix elements in the correlation matrix. From this information, one can plot the correlation function for the network and to extract the correlation length. The connectivity of a network is then defined as the ratio between this correlation length and the average path length of the network. Using this method, we distinguish between a topological small world and a functional small world, where the latter is characterized by long-range correlations and high connectivity. Clearly, networks that share the same topology may have different connectivities, based on the nature and strength of their interactions. The method is demonstrated on metabolic networks, but can be readily generalized to other types of networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19905387     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  10 in total

1.  Response to letter of correspondence - Bastiaens et al.

Authors:  Baruch Barzel; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Predicting perturbation patterns from the topology of biological networks.

Authors:  Marc Santolini; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A physical model for dementia.

Authors:  O Sotolongo-Costa; L M Gaggero-Sager; J T Becker; F Maestu; O Sotolongo-Grau
Journal:  Physica A       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  Network link prediction by global silencing of indirect correlations.

Authors:  Baruch Barzel; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Interactions between distant ceRNAs in regulatory networks.

Authors:  Mor Nitzan; Avital Steiman-Shimony; Yael Altuvia; Ofer Biham; Hanah Margalit
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Network analysis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): a new horizon for the understanding of disease pathogenesis and therapeutic target identification.

Authors:  Rachelle Donn; Chiara De Leonibus; Stefan Meyer; Adam Stevens
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.054

7.  Dynamic patterns of information flow in complex networks.

Authors:  Uzi Harush; Baruch Barzel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.

Authors:  Sacha Epskamp; Denny Borsboom; Eiko I Fried
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-02

9.  The heparin-binding proteome in normal pancreas and murine experimental acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Quentin M Nunes; Dunhao Su; Philip J Brownridge; Deborah M Simpson; Changye Sun; Yong Li; Thao P Bui; Xiaoying Zhang; Wei Huang; Daniel J Rigden; Robert J Beynon; Robert Sutton; David G Fernig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Distribution equality as an optimal epidemic mitigation strategy.

Authors:  Adar Hacohen; Reuven Cohen; Sol Efroni; Ido Bachelet; Baruch Barzel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.