Literature DB >> 19904290

Validity and reliability testing of a short questionnaire developed to assess consumers' use, understanding and perception of food labels.

D Mackison1, W L Wrieden, A S Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Food labels may have an important function in communicating nutrition information and have considerable potential to influence food choice and dietary behaviour.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity and reliability of a short (self-complete) questionnaire designed to measure consumers' use and understanding of food labels.
METHODS: Questionnaire content was determined by gaps highlighted in a literature review of food labelling. Nineteen questions (49 items) assessing frequency of label reading perceived importance of food labels, regularity of dining out, desire to have nutrition information at specific catering outlets and ability to perform nutrition information tasks were formulated and presented on four pages of A4. With the exception of two open-ended questions, all items were presented as closed (field box) structures. Content validity, face validity, item analysis, repeat and internal reliability were assessed.
RESULTS: Nutrition experts (26) completed detailed content validity assessment, resulting in high scores for appropriateness, importance and phrasing of questions, although grammar and terminology changes were required. Face validity indicated that the questionnaire was quick to complete (<15 min), easy to follow and comprehensible. Cronbach's alpha scores (internal reliability) for questions with multiple sections ranged from 0.72 to 0.91, indicating good internal consistency. Repeat reliability testing showed Spearman's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.51 to 0.97 (all P<0.001) showing high temporal stability. Item Difficulty analysis indicated that questions (Section C only) were at an appropriate level (with P between 20 and 80% for all items). Item discrimination analysis ranged from r=0.43 to 0.70, highlighting that items were suitable for inclusion.
CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire is a suitable tool for assessing consumers' use, understanding and perception of food labels.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19904290     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  6 in total

1.  Caffeine Consumption among Various University Students in the UAE, Exploring the Frequencies, Different Sources and Reporting Adverse Effects and Withdrawal Symptoms.

Authors:  Zelal Kharaba; Nour Sammani; Samar Ashour; Rose Ghemrawi; Ahmad Z Al Meslamani; Ahmad Al-Azayzih; Manal Ali Buabeid; Yassen Alfoteih
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  A randomized trial testing the efficacy of modifications to the nutrition facts table on comprehension and use of nutrition information by adolescents and young adults in Canada.

Authors:  E Hobin; J Sacco; L Vanderlee; C M White; F Zuo; J Sheeshka; G McVey; M Fodor O'Brien; D Hammond
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of different scoring algorithms applied to multiple-mark survey items on outcome assessment: an in-field study on health-related knowledge.

Authors:  A Domnich; D Panatto; L Arata; I Bevilacqua; L Apprato; R Gasparini; D Amicizia
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2015

4.  Are Food Labels Effective as a Means of Health Prevention?

Authors:  Gaia Claudia Viviana Viola; Francesca Bianchi; Elia Croce; Elisabetta Ceretti
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2016-12-21

5.  A Consumer Segmentation Study of Nutrition Information Seeking and Its Relation to Food Consumption in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yin Wang; Jiayou Wang; Qiong Shen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-03

6.  Health Behavior Knowledge and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Body Weight.

Authors:  Pouran Faghri; Jennifer Buden
Journal:  J Nutr Disord Ther       Date:  2015-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.