Literature DB >> 19903754

Clinical heterogeneity in monogenic diabetes caused by mutations in the glucokinase gene (GCK-MODY).

Antonio L Cuesta-Muñoz1, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Nadia Cobo-Vuilleumier, Hanna Koskela, Stella Odili, Amanda Stride, Carol Buettger, Timo Otonkoski, Philippe Froguel, Joseph Grimsby, Maria Garcia-Gimeno, Franz M Matschinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the heterogeneity in the clinical expression in a family with glucokinase mature-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Members (three generations) of the same family presented either with overt neonatal hyperglycemia, marked postprandial hyperglycemia, or glucosuria. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA(IR)) and insulinogenic and disposition indexes were calculated. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results in the GCK mutation carriers from this family were compared with those from other subjects with GCK mutations in the same codon (GCK(261)), with other missense and other types of GCK mutations in different codons from the European MODY Consortium database (GCK(m)).
RESULTS: Mutation G261R was found in the GCK gene. During the OGTT, glucose (P = 0.02) and insulin (P = 0.009) response at 2 h as well as at the 2-h glucose increment (GCK(261) versus other missense GCK mutations, P = 0.003) were significantly higher in GCK(261) than in GCK(m) carriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Differing from other GCK(m) carriers, the glucose and insulin response to oral glucose was significantly higher in GCK(261) carriers, indicating clinical heterogeneity in GCK-MODY.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903754      PMCID: PMC2809268          DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


Inactivating heterozygous mutations in the glucokinase gene (GCK) cause a form of monogenic diabetes with autosomal dominant inheritance (GCK mature-onset diabetes of the young [MODY]) (1,2). GCK-MODY has generally been considered a phenotypically homogenous mild form of diabetes, which does not lead to marked hyperglycemia or diabetes complications and does not need treatment (2–5). Phenotypic heterogeneity within carriers of the same GCK mutation has been observed only in one family (6). Here, we report a new GCK-MODY (GCK-G261R) family characterized by marked prandial hyperglycemia and unusual high levels of postprandial insulinemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The proband (online appendix Fig. A1, available at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dc09-0681/DC1) was a firstborn child from a Finnish family with neonatal plasma glucose of 10 mmol/l. At 2 years of age, without treatment, she presented preprandial and postprandial capillary glucose of 6.5–6.8 and 8.6 mmol/l, respectively. Her younger sister had random glucose between 7 and 11.5 mmol/l as a neonate. Their mother was diagnosed with gestational diabetes and treated with insulin. After the pregnancy, she had an A1C of 5.8% without insulin treatment, but due to high postprandial plasma glucose (10–11 mmol/l), rapid-acting meal-time insulin was started. Since the second pregnancy, she is treated with diet alone. The maternal grandmother presented with hyperglycemia and glucosuria at age of 22 years and gestational diabetes during four pregnancies. She was treated with diet during the first pregnancy and with insulin during three later pregnancies, after which she had been without treatment. Her fasting capillary glucose level was normally ∼6–7 mmol/l but stayed at ∼10 mmol/l for nearly 2 weeks after intake of larger quantities of carbohydrates and returned to 6–7 mmol/l when carbohydrates were restricted. She takes 60 mg of nateglinide before meals. All available family members were offered an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and/or genetic testing for the mutation after genetic counseling. OGTT (except subjects <15 years) with samples drawn at −5, 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min was performed to determine plasma glucose and serum insulin. Insulin resistance and β-cell function was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMAIR) and the insulinogenic indexes (IG30), respectively. The disposition index (DI) was used to assess β-cell compensation. These results and those from 15 subjects with GCK mutations in position 261 (GCK261) from the European MODY Consortium Database (EMCD) (3) were compared with that of carriers of other missense and other types of GCK mutations (insertions, deletions, etc.) (GCKm) and normoglycemic control subjects from the Botnia Study (Table 1). The studies were approved by the institutional ethics committee. Written consent was obtained from the adults and from the parents of the children. DNA extraction, microsatellite genotyping, direct sequencing, and functional analysis of the glucokinase protein (gk), with and without gk activator, were performed as described (7–10).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with glucokinase inactivating mutation GCK and functional studies of recombinant human wild-type and mutants' gk

GCK261: mutationsP1Other missense: GCK mutationsP2Other GCK: mutation typesP3Normal glucose tolerance: control subjectsP4
n (male/female)23 (13/10)144 (73/71)82 (42/40)45 (20/25)
BMI (kg/m2)21.80 (7.0)NS20.00 (5.42)NS21.30 (5.73)NS23.7 (6.2)NS
Age (years)20.00 (27.0)NS19.00 (27.00)NS29.00 (28)NS41.6 (31)0.001
0-min plasma glucose (mmol/l)7.00 (0.69)NS6.70 (0.90)NS6.80 (1.01)0.175.0 (0.7)NS
120-min plasma glucose (mmol/l)10.90 (4.13)0.028.60 (2.58)0.0468.60 (2.98)0.385.5 (1.8)NS
2hΔPG (mmol/l)4.12 (3.25)0.0032.00 (2.05)0.0462.50 (2.20)0.2330.6 (1.8)0.004
0-min plasma insulin (mU/l)10.00 (7.44)NS8.00 (6.00)NS9.00 (5.00)0.417.7 (7.7)NS
120-min plasma insulin (mU/l)55.2 (28.05)0.00925.00 (23.50)0.00224.00 (13.50)0.1130.2 (27.4)0.03
Incremental I/G308.71 (7.46)0.1066.09 (3.74)0.5134.21 (5.55)0.67223.7 (25.4)0.003
HOMAIR3.47 (2.31)0.5682.68 (2.45)0.3182.21 (1.92)0.2591.7 (1.4)0.045
DI3.23 (2.25)NS2.64 (2.02)NS1.98 (2.18)0.7615.5 (13.5)0.004

Upper panel: data are median (interquartile range). Clinical characteristics, glucose, and insulin values of patients with GCK-inactivating mutation GCK, other missense GCK-inactivating mutations, and other types of GCK-inactivating mutations (insertions, deletions, frame shifts, etc.). For insulin data: n = 11 (GCK), 36 (other missense GCK mutations), 45 (other types of GCK mutations), and 45 (normal glucose tolerant controls); P1: GCK mutations vs. other missense GCK mutations; P2: GCK mutations vs. other types of GCK mutations; P3: other missense GCK mutations vs. other types of GCK mutations; P4: GCK mutations vs. control subjects. P < 0.05–0.00001 are considered statistically significant. HOMAIR = fasting serum insulin × fasting serum glucose/22.5. Insulinogenic index (I/G30) = serum insulin at 30 min − serum insulin at 0 min/serum glucose at 30 min − serum glucose at 0 min. DI = insulinogenic index/HOMAIR. Lower panel: data are means of the three independent analyses. Results of the functional studies of gk-WT and mutants gk-G261R and gk-G261E. AI, the activity index for the enzyme was calculated as previously described (8). Glucose S0.5 of gk-G261R mutations was carried out with 25 mmol/l of MgATP, and the ATPKm measurement was performed at glucose concentration of 500 mmol/l. T-GSIR, threshold for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.

Clinical characteristics of patients with glucokinase inactivating mutation GCK and functional studies of recombinant human wild-type and mutants' gk Upper panel: data are median (interquartile range). Clinical characteristics, glucose, and insulin values of patients with GCK-inactivating mutation GCK, other missense GCK-inactivating mutations, and other types of GCK-inactivating mutations (insertions, deletions, frame shifts, etc.). For insulin data: n = 11 (GCK), 36 (other missense GCK mutations), 45 (other types of GCK mutations), and 45 (normal glucose tolerant controls); P1: GCK mutations vs. other missense GCK mutations; P2: GCK mutations vs. other types of GCK mutations; P3: other missense GCK mutations vs. other types of GCK mutations; P4: GCK mutations vs. control subjects. P < 0.05–0.00001 are considered statistically significant. HOMAIR = fasting serum insulin × fasting serum glucose/22.5. Insulinogenic index (I/G30) = serum insulin at 30 min − serum insulin at 0 min/serum glucose at 30 min − serum glucose at 0 min. DI = insulinogenic index/HOMAIR. Lower panel: data are means of the three independent analyses. Results of the functional studies of gk-WT and mutants gk-G261R and gk-G261E. AI, the activity index for the enzyme was calculated as previously described (8). Glucose S0.5 of gk-G261R mutations was carried out with 25 mmol/l of MgATP, and the ATPKm measurement was performed at glucose concentration of 500 mmol/l. T-GSIR, threshold for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.

RESULTS

The mutation G261R (exon 7) on GCK was found in the proband and in nine family members (aged 0.2–72 years) with abnormal fasting glucose. Fasting plasma glucose ranged from 6.0 to 7.6 mmol/l. The 2-h plasma glucose ranged from 9.3 to 14.5 mmol/l in the carriers, three of them presented values exceeding 13 mmol/l. All but one of the carriers had a 2-h increment in plasma glucose (2hΔPG) higher than 3 mmol/l and half higher than 6 mmol/l. Fasting insulin was 4.1–9.9 mU/l and 2-h insulin 28.8–61.9 mU/l. There was no relationship between age and glucose or insulin concentrations. The GCK261 mutation carriers from our family, like those from the EMCD, had a significantly higher glucose and insulin response compared with GCKm carriers (Table 1). Fasting plasma glucose and insulin were similar in all groups; however, the 2-h plasma glucose and insulin and 2hΔPG values were significantly higher in GCK261 carriers than in GCKm carriers (Table 1). The glucose response during OGTT was higher at all time points in GCK261 carriers compared also with GCKm carriers (data not shown). In 61 and 35% of GCK261 carriers, 2hΔPG was >3 and 4.6 mmol/l, respectively. HOMAIR, I/G30, and DI values were higher (not significant) in the GCK261 carriers (Table 1), indicating possibly higher degree of β-cell compensation (Table 1). The results from the functional studies showed that the mutations gk-G261R/E lead to a severely effected protein, with an almost negligible enzyme activity, indicating that these gk mutants cannot contribute to β-cell and hepatic glucose phosphorylation. The effect of the gk activator on the inactivating gk-G261R mutation was similar to that on the gk-WT (see online appendix Table A1).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical phenotype of carriers from our family was heterogeneous. The proband and her sister presented with neonatal hyperglycemia, their mother with gestational diabetes, and the maternal grandmother with glucosuria. Many carriers had much higher 2hΔPG values than what is usually seen in GCK-MODY. In three carriers (one child and two adults), it exceeded 13 mmol/l and in another young carrier 12 mmol/l, indicating no relationship between high 2hΔPG values and age. A similar pattern was seen in other carriers of the same mutation, while those with other GCK mutations in the MODY database had a lower glucose response during OGTT. Of note, a similar pattern of glucose response as in GCK261 carriers has previously been observed in GCK-L184P carriers (6). However, while the insulin response was attenuated in GCK-L184P carriers, in GCK261 carriers it was high and significantly different from that seen with other GCK mutations (11). Glucokinase is required for glycogen synthesis in liver (12). One explanation for the high 2-h glucose in GCK261 carriers could be reduced hepatic glycogen synthesis due to the lost of activity of GCK261. Hence, the marked insulin response could be due to larger β-cell compensation in GCK261 carriers. Nonetheless, possible additional genetic defects could be also involved. In summary, the clinical phenotype of patients with GCK-MODY can be heterogeneous and patients carrying severe inactivating GCK mutations can have high postchallenge glucose values, possibly resulting from a marked liver component of the disease.
  12 in total

1.  Phenotypic heterogeneity between different mutations of MODY subtypes and within MODY pedigrees.

Authors:  S S Fajans; G I Bell
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Characterization of the MODY3 phenotype. Early-onset diabetes caused by an insulin secretion defect.

Authors:  M Lehto; T Tuomi; M M Mahtani; E Widén; C Forsblom; L Sarelin; M Gullström; B Isomaa; M Lehtovirta; A Hyrkkö; T Kanninen; M Orho; S Manley; R C Turner; T Brettin; A Kirby; J Thomas; G Duyk; E Lander; M R Taskinen; L Groop
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Mutants of glucokinase cause hypoglycaemia- and hyperglycaemia syndromes and their analysis illuminates fundamental quantitative concepts of glucose homeostasis.

Authors:  E A Davis; A Cuesta-Muñoz; M Raoul; C Buettger; I Sweet; M Moates; M A Magnuson; F M Matschinsky
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Allosteric activators of glucokinase: potential role in diabetes therapy.

Authors:  Joseph Grimsby; Ramakanth Sarabu; Wendy L Corbett; Nancy-Ellen Haynes; Fred T Bizzarro; John W Coffey; Kevin R Guertin; Darryl W Hilliard; Robert F Kester; Paige E Mahaney; Linda Marcus; Lida Qi; Cheryl L Spence; John Tengi; Mark A Magnuson; Chang An Chu; Mark T Dvorozniak; Franz M Matschinsky; Joseph F Grippo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Familial hyperglycemia due to mutations in glucokinase. Definition of a subtype of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P Froguel; H Zouali; N Vionnet; G Velho; M Vaxillaire; F Sun; S Lesage; M Stoffel; J Takeda; P Passa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Assessing the potential of glucokinase activators in diabetes therapy.

Authors:  Franz M Matschinsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Clinical implications of a molecular genetic classification of monogenic beta-cell diabetes.

Authors:  Rinki Murphy; Sian Ellard; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-02-26

8.  The genetic abnormality in the beta cell determines the response to an oral glucose load.

Authors:  A Stride; M Vaxillaire; T Tuomi; F Barbetti; P R Njølstad; T Hansen; A Costa; I Conget; O Pedersen; O Søvik; R Lorini; L Groop; P Froguel; A T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young.

Authors:  S Ellard; C Bellanné-Chantelot; A T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Long-term follow-up of oral glucose tolerance test-derived glucose tolerance and insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity indexes in subjects with glucokinase mutations (MODY2).

Authors:  Delphine Martin; Christine Bellanné-Chantelot; Inge Deschamps; Philippe Froguel; Jean-Jacques Robert; Gilberto Velho
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  16 in total

1.  Glucokinase links Krüppel-like factor 6 to the regulation of hepatic insulin sensitivity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Lars P Bechmann; Amalia Gastaldelli; Diana Vetter; Gillian L Patman; Laura Pascoe; Rebekka A Hannivoort; Ursula E Lee; Isabel Fiel; Ursula Muñoz; Demetrio Ciociaro; Young-Min Lee; Emma Buzzigoli; Luca Miele; Kei Y Hui; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Alastair D Burt; Christopher P Day; Andrea Mari; Loranne Agius; Mark Walker; Scott L Friedman; Helen L Reeves
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Repair of diverse diabetic defects of β-cells in man and mouse by pharmacological glucokinase activation.

Authors:  Nicolai M Doliba; Deborah Fenner; Bogumil Zelent; Joseph Bass; Ramakanth Sarabu; Franz M Matschinsky
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 3.  Not quite type 1 or type 2, what now? Review of monogenic, mitochondrial, and syndromic diabetes.

Authors:  Roseanne O Yeung; Fady Hannah-Shmouni; Karen Niederhoffer; Mark A Walker
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  How Heterogeneity in Glucokinase and Gap-Junction Coupling Determines the Islet [Ca2+] Response.

Authors:  JaeAnn M Dwulet; Nurin W F Ludin; Robert A Piscopio; Wolfgang E Schleicher; Ong Moua; Matthew J Westacott; Richard K P Benninger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Monogenic diabetes: a gateway to precision medicine in diabetes.

Authors:  Haichen Zhang; Kevin Colclough; Anna L Gloyn; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Serum levels of pancreatic stone protein (PSP)/reg1A as an indicator of beta-cell apoptosis suggest an increased apoptosis rate in hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha (HNF1A-MODY) carriers from the third decade of life onward.

Authors:  Siobhan Bacon; Ma Peyh Kyithar; Jasmin Schmid; Syed R Rizvi; Caroline Bonner; Rolf Graf; Jochen Hm Prehn; Maria M Byrne
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.763

Review 7.  MODY: history, genetics, pathophysiology, and clinical decision making.

Authors:  Stefan S Fajans; Graeme I Bell
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Phenotype variability and neonatal diabetes in a large family with heterozygous mutation of the glucokinase gene.

Authors:  Maciej Borowiec; Malgorzata Mysliwiec; Wojciech Fendler; Karolina Antosik; Agnieszka Brandt; Maciej Malecki; Wojciech Mlynarski
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Insights into the pathogenicity of rare missense GCK variants from the identification and functional characterization of compound heterozygous and double mutations inherited in cis.

Authors:  Nicola L Beer; Kara K Osbak; Martijn van de Bunt; Nicholas D Tribble; Anna M Steele; Kirsty J Wensley; Emma L Edghill; Kevin Colcough; Amy Barrett; Lucia Valentínová; Jana K Rundle; Anne Raimondo; Joseph Grimsby; Sian Ellard; Anna L Gloyn
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Many faces of monogenic diabetes.

Authors:  Valerie M Schwitzgebel
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.