Literature DB >> 19903569

Nanomaterials for environmental studies: classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation.

Vicki Stone1, Bernd Nowack, Anders Baun, Nico van den Brink, Frank von der Kammer, Maria Dusinska, Richard Handy, Steven Hankin, Martin Hassellöv, Erik Joner, Teresa F Fernandes.   

Abstract

NanoImpactNet is a European Commission Framework Programme 7 (FP7) funded project that provides a forum for the discussion of current opinions on nanomaterials in relation to human and environmental issues. In September 2008, in Zurich, a NanoImpactNet environmental workshop focused on three key questions: 1. What properties should be characterised for nanomaterials used in environmental and ecotoxicology studies? 2. What reference materials should be developed for use in environmental and ecotoxicological studies? 3. Is it possible to group different nanomaterials into categories for consideration in environmental studies? Such questions have been, at least partially, addressed by other projects/workshops especially in relation to human health effects. Such projects provide a useful basis on which this workshop was based, but in this particular case these questions were reformulated in order to focus specifically on environmental studies. The workshop participants, through a series of discussion and reflection sessions, generated the conclusions listed below. The physicochemical characterisation information identified as important for environmental studies included measures of aggregation/agglomeration/dispersability, size, dissolution (solubility), surface area, surface charge, surface chemistry/composition, with the assumption that chemical composition would already be known. There is a need to have test materials for ecotoxicology, and several substances are potentially useful, including TiO(2) nanoparticles, polystyrene beads labelled with fluorescent dyes, and silver nanoparticles. Some of these test materials could then be developed into certified reference materials over time. No clear consensus was reached regarding the classification of nanomaterials into categories to aid environmental studies, except that a chemistry-based classification system was a reasonable starting point, with some modifications. It was suggested, that additional work may be required to derive criteria that can be used to generate such categories, that would also include aspects of the material structure and physical behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903569     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  34 in total

Review 1.  Pollution due to hazardous glass waste.

Authors:  Deepak Pant; Pooja Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A network perspective reveals decreasing material diversity in studies on nanoparticle interactions with dissolved organic matter.

Authors:  Nicole Sani-Kast; Jérôme Labille; Patrick Ollivier; Danielle Slomberg; Konrad Hungerbühler; Martin Scheringer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Kinetics and mechanisms of nanosilver oxysulfidation.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Kelly G Pennell; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Copper nanoparticles synthesized by polyol process used to control hematophagous parasites.

Authors:  Jeyaraman Ramyadevi; Kadarkaraithangam Jeyasubramanian; Arumugam Marikani; Govindasamy Rajakumar; Abdul Abdul Rahuman; Thirunavukkarasu Santhoshkumar; Arivarasan Vishnu Kirthi; Chidambaram Jayaseelan; Sampath Marimuthu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Development of reference metal and metal oxide engineered nanomaterials for nanotoxicology research using high throughput and precision flame spray synthesis approaches.

Authors:  Juan Beltran-Huarac; Zhenyuan Zhang; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Glen DeLoid; Nachiket Vaze; Saber M Hussain; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2017-12-02

7.  Removal of chlorpyrifos, thiamethoxam, and tebuconazole from water using green synthesized metal hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles.

Authors:  Manviri Rani; Uma Shanker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities.

Authors:  Prashant Kumar; Paul Fennell; Alan Robins
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Toward a robust analytical method for separating trace levels of nano-materials in natural waters: cloud point extraction of nano-copper(II) oxide.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Majedi; Barry C Kelly; Hian Kee Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment.

Authors:  Paul Westerhoff; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 22.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.