Literature DB >> 19903284

Age-related donor return patterns among first-time blood donors in the United States.

Edward P Notari1, Shimian Zou, Chyang T Fang, Anne F Eder, Richard J Benjamin, Roger Y Dodd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Committed repeat donors are vital to the continued success of blood collections, yet the effect of age of first-time (FT) donation on return behavior is poorly described. Sixteen-year-old donors are increasingly allowed to donate and have the highest rates of adverse events, which negatively impacts return behavior. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Annual cohorts of allogeneic FT donors from 2005 and 2006 were selected within the American Red Cross system and followed for 25 and 13 months, respectively. Return and total yield rates among different age groups were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 2.3 million FT donors from 2005 and 2006 gave 4.2 million donations during the study. Sixteen- to 19-year old FT donors made up 41% of the FT donor base in 2005 and 16-, 17-, 18-, and 19-year-olds, respectively, had initial return rates of 62, 52, 35, and 28% and yield rates of 2.0, 1.76, 1.51, and 1.41 over 13 months. Multivariate analysis of FT yield rates shows that younger (16 and 17 years) and older (50+ years) donors, males, blood group O donors, and those without any initial adverse reaction are most likely to return. Increasing severity of donor adverse reactions correlated with a reduction in yield and return rates.
CONCLUSION: FT 16-year-old donors had the highest return and yield rates despite the negative impact of increased adverse event rates. Donation at young age is critical to building a cadre of committed repeat donors but donor reactions must be addressed to ensure the donors' well-being and to sustain return behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02288.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  23 in total

1.  Sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics associated with blood donation in the United States: a population-based study.

Authors:  Eshan U Patel; Evan M Bloch; Mary K Grabowski; Ruchika Goel; Parvez M Lokhandwala; Patricia A R Brunker; Jodie L White; Beth Shaz; Paul M Ness; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Number of recent sexual partners among blood donors in Brazil: associations with donor demographics, donation characteristics, and infectious disease markers.

Authors:  Giuseppina Maria Patavino; Cesar de Almeida-Neto; Jing Liu; David J Wright; Alfredo Mendrone-Junior; Maria Inês Lopes Ferreira; Anna Bárbara de Freitas Carneiro; Brian Custer; João Eduardo Ferreira; Michael P Busch; Ester Cerdeira Sabino
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return.

Authors:  Johanna C Wiersum-Osselton; Tanneke Marijt-van der Kreek; Anneke Brand; Ingrid Veldhuizen; Johanna G van der Bom; Wim de Kort
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Donation return time at fixed and mobile donation sites.

Authors:  Patricia M Carey; Patrick M High; Karen S Schlumpf; Bryce R Johnson; Alan E Mast; Jorge A Rios; Toby L Simon; Susan L Wilkinson
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 5.  Individual, contextual and network characteristics of blood donors and non-donors: a systematic review of recent literature.

Authors:  Tjeerd W Piersma; René Bekkers; Elisabeth F Klinkenberg; Wim L A M De Kort; Eva-Maria Merz
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Experiencing is believing: prior experience moderates the impact of self-based and socially-based cues in the context of blood donation.

Authors:  Lindsay Roberts; Jason P Rose; Erin A Vogel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-06-19

7.  Interdonation intervals and patterns of return among blood donors in Brazil.

Authors:  Cesar de Almeida Neto; Alfredo Mendrone; Brian Custer; Jing Liu; Anna Bárbara Carneiro-Proietti; Silvana A Carneiro Leão; David J Wright; Edward L Murphy; Ester Cerdeira Sabino
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Applying self-determination theory to the blood donation context: The blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) trial.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Janis L France; Bruce W Carlson; Victoria Frye; Louisa Duffy; Debra A Kessler; Mark Rebosa; Beth H Shaz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  2016 proceedings of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's scientific priorities in pediatric transfusion medicine.

Authors:  Pablo Cure; Melania Bembea; Stella Chou; Allan Doctor; Anne Eder; Jeanne Hendrickson; Cassandra D Josephson; Alan E Mast; William Savage; Martha Sola-Visner; Philip Spinella; Simon Stanworth; Marie Steiner; Traci Mondoro; Shimian Zou; Catherine Levy; Myron Waclawiw; Nahed El Kassar; Simone Glynn; Naomi L C Luban
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Retention of blood donors: strategies to fulfill the requirements of blood centers.

Authors:  Cesar de Almeida Neto
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.