Literature DB >> 19902362

Relative bioavailability of chlorothiazide from mucoadhesive compacts in pigs.

Karunakar Neelam1, Ravichandran Mahalingam, Raj Birudaraj, Tom Alfredson, Pratap Anne, Xiaoling Li, Bhaskara R Jasti.   

Abstract

The relative bioavailability of chlorothiazide from mucoadhesive polymeric compacts is compared to commercial oral suspension in pigs. A single-dose randomized study was conducted in 12 healthy pigs that are 9-10 weeks old. After overnight fasting, pigs were divided into two groups of six animals. To the first group, a reference product containing 50 mg of chlorothiazide suspension, and in the second group, test product (mucoadhesive compacts) chlorothiazide (50 mg) was administered with 75 mL of water via gastric tubes. Blood samples were collected between 0 to 24 h using catheters inserted into the jugular vein. Plasma was separated by protein precipitation, and chlorothiazide concentrations were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography method. The mean Tmax and the Cmax of chlorothiazide following the administration of oral suspension and mucoadhesive compacts were 0.58+/-0.20 h and 682.97+/-415.69 ng/mL and 2.17+/-0.98 h and 99.42+/-124.08 ng/mL, respectively. The Kel and T1/2 of chlorothiazide were found to be 1.06+/-0.28 h(-1) and 0.70+/-0.21 h from suspension and 0.95+/-1.11 h(-1) and 2.05+/-1.90 h from the compacts, respectively. The Tmax of mucoadhesive compacts were significantly longer (p<0.05; 2.17 h) than the reference products (0.58 h), whereas the Cmax of compacts were significantly lower (99 ng/mL) than the reference product (683 ng/mL; p<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of compacts accounts only 50.15% (404.32+/-449.93 ng h/mL) of the reference product's AUC (806.27+/-395.97 ng h/mL). The relative bioavailability of the compacts was lower than that of the suspension, and this may be due to the narrow window of absorption for chlorothiazide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902362      PMCID: PMC2799598          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-009-9332-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  25 in total

1.  Specific and non-specific bioadhesive particulate systems for oral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Principle and investigation of the bioadhesion mechanism of solid dosage forms.

Authors:  D Duchêne; G Ponchel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Formulation strategies for absorption windows.

Authors:  Stanley S Davis
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 4.  Gastroretentive drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Alexander Streubel; Juergen Siepmann; Roland Bodmeier
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  Compressed collagen sponges as gastroretentive dosage forms: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Rüdiger Gröning; Christina Cloer; Manolis Georgarakis; Rotraut S Müller
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Formulation and evaluation of famotidine floating tablets.

Authors:  M Jaimini; A C Rana; Y S Tanwar
Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Molecular aspects of muco- and bioadhesion: tethered structures and site-specific surfaces.

Authors:  Y Huang; W Leobandung; A Foss; N A Peppas
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Comparative pharmacokinetic study of a floating multiple-unit capsule, a high-density multiple-unit capsule and an immediate-release tablet containing 25 mg atenolol.

Authors:  N Rouge; E Allémann; M Gex-Fabry; L Balant; E T Cole; P Buri; E Doelker
Journal:  Pharm Acta Helv       Date:  1998-07

9.  Floating microparticles based on low density foam powder.

Authors:  A Streubel; J Siepmann; R Bodmeier
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 5.875

10.  Selection of drug candidates for gastroretentive dosage forms: pharmacokinetics following continuous intragastric mode of administration in a rat model.

Authors:  Leonid Kagan; Amnon Hoffman
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 5.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.