Literature DB >> 19902305

Spatial displacement of release point can enhance activity of an attractant pheromone synergist of a bark beetle.

Brian T Sullivan1, Kenji Mori.   

Abstract

Flight responses of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, to widely-spaced (>130 m) traps baited with pine volatiles (in turpentine) and the female-produced pheromone component frontalin were enhanced when a bait containing the male pheromone component (+)-endo-brevicomin was attached directly to the trap. However, displacing this bait 4-16 m horizontally from the trap significantly increased its synergistic effect. (+)-endo-Brevicomin enhanced catch to the same degree when the bait was positioned either on the trap or 32 m away. In another experiment, pairs of frontalin/turpentine-baited traps were established with 4 m spacing between traps and >100 m spacing between pairs. Attachment of either a racemic or (+)-endo-brevicomin bait to one trap of a pair caused a significant increase in catch by both traps, but catch in the trap lacking endo-brevicomin was increased more than in its endo-brevicomin-baited twin. In a third experiment, widely-spaced groups of three traps (in a line with 1 and 4 m spacing between the middle and outer traps) were baited uniformly with frontalin and turpentine, and the release rate of (+)-endo-brevicomin from the middle trap was varied across three orders of magnitude. Release rates sufficient to enhance total D. frontalis catch by the trio also caused relatively higher catches to occur in the outer traps than in the middle one. These experiments indicated that both male and female D. frontalis fly to and land preferentially at sources of frontalin and host odors when these are located some distance away from a source of endo-brevicomin. This behavior may have evolved in D. frontalis to allow host-seeking beetles to locate growing, multi-tree infestations while avoiding fully-colonized trees within these infestations. Our data demonstrate that trap spacing alone can qualitatively change the outcome of bait evaluation trials and may explain why many earlier experiments with endo-brevicomin failed to identify it as an aggregation pheromone synergist for D. frontalis. We believe that important aggregative functions of semiochemicals of other bark beetle species may have been similarly overlooked due to choice of experimental procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902305     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-009-9705-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  16 in total

1.  Attraction to pheromone sources of different quantity, quality, and spacing: Density-regulation mechanisms in bark beetleIps typographus.

Authors:  F Schlyter; J A Byers; J Löfqvist
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Interactions of pheromone component odor plumes of western pine beetle.

Authors:  J A Byers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Proximity of release points of pheromone components as a factor confusing males of the spotted stem borer,Chilo partellus, approaching the trap.

Authors:  S A Lux; A Hassanali; W Lwande; F N Njogu
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Spatial discrimination between sources of pheromone and an inhibitor by the light-brown apple mothEpiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).

Authors:  E R Rumbo; S M Deacon; L P Regan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Trapping the western pine beetle at and near a source of synthetic attractive pheromone: Effects of trap size and position.

Authors:  P E Tilden; W D Bedard; D L Wood; K Q Lindahl; P A Rauch
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Filamentous nature of pheromone plumes protects integrity of signal from background chemical noise in cabbage looper moth,Trichoplusia ni.

Authors:  Y B Liu; K F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the spruce bark beetleIps typographus from different attack phases.

Authors:  G Birgersson; F Schlyter; J Löfqvist; G Bergström
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Attractive and inhibitory pheromones produced in the bark beetle,Dendroctonus brevicomis, during host colonization: Regulation of inter- and intraspecific competition.

Authors:  J A Byers; D L Wood; J Craig; L B Hendry
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  (S)-(+)-Ipsdienol: Interspecific inhibition ofIps latidens (leconte) byIps pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).

Authors:  D R Miller; J H Borden
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Wind-tunnel study on attraction inhibitor in maleColeophora laricella Hbn. (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae).

Authors:  P Witzgall; E Priesner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  5 in total

1.  Attraction modulated by spacing of pheromone components and anti-attractants in a bark beetle and a moth.

Authors:  Martin N Andersson; Muhammad Binyameen; Medhat M Sadek; Fredrik Schlyter
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Variable responses by southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, to the pheromone component endo-brevicomin: influence of enantiomeric composition, release rate, and proximity to infestations.

Authors:  Brian T Sullivan; Mark J Dalusky; Kenji Mori; Cavell Brownie
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Field Response of Black Turpentine Beetle to Pine Resin Oxidation and Pheromone Displacement.

Authors:  Gabriel A LeMay; Thomas O'Loughlin; David Wakarchuk; Jiri Hulcr
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.793

4.  Western Pine Beetle Populations in Arizona and California Differ in the Composition of Their Aggregation Pheromones.

Authors:  Deepa S Pureswaran; Richard W Hofstetter; Brian T Sullivan; Amanda M Grady; Cavell Brownie
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Spatial Displacement of a Lure Component Can Reduce Catches of Two Nontarget Species During Spring Monitoring of Southern Pine Beetle.

Authors:  William P Shepherd; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.