Literature DB >> 19901873

Effect of dressing choice on outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review.

J Tustanowski1.   

Abstract

Selecting the right dressing for these wounds can prevent blistering, maceration and the risk of infection. Ideally, the dressing should be permeable, waterproof, transparent, absorbent and flexible enough to withstand joint movement.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19901873     DOI： 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.11.44985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN： 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  10 in total

1.  Achieving international consensus for the prevention of orthopaedic wound blistering: results of a Delphi survey.

Authors:  Karen Ousey; Warren Gillibrand; John Stephenson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Sang Wook Lee; Oliver Atanacio; Javad Parvizi; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Randomized controlled trial of conventional versus modern surgical dressings following primary total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Amine Zaoui; Camille Ozil; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Philippe Anract; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Katharina Hoffmann; Johannes Oppermann; Martin Hellmich; Peer Eysel; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  A New Dressing System Reduces the Number of Dressing Changes in the Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shilong Su; Juan He; Chenggong Wang; Fawei Gao; Da Zhong; Pengfei Lei
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 6.  Wound dressings for primary and revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Madhav Chowdhry; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

7.  Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Johannes Oppermann; Katharina Hoffmann; Martin Hellmich; Birte Wenk; Marvin Simons; Peer Eysel; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Open-label clinical trial comparing the clinical and economic effectiveness of using a polyurethane film surgical dressing with gauze surgical dressings in the care of post-operative surgical wounds.

Authors:  Ana Abejón Arroyo; Pabló López Casanova; José Verdú Soriano; Joan-Enric Torra I Bou
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Comparative study of antibacterial effects and bacterial retentivity of wound dressings.

Authors:  Toshihiro Fujiwara; Ko Hosokawa; Tateki Kubo
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-01-24

10.  Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S L Karlakki; A K Hamad; C Whittall; N M Graham; R D Banerjee; J H Kuiper
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.853
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.