Literature DB >> 19901671

Routine versus selective multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in blunt trauma patients: level of agreement on the influence of additional findings on management.

Jaap Deunk1, Monique Brink, Helena M Dekker, Digna R Kool, Johan G Blickman, Arie B van Vugt, Michael J Edwards.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to determine the agreement between and within surgeons concerning the influence on treatment plan of routine versus selective multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) findings in blunt trauma patients. PATIENTS: For this study, 50 patients were randomly selected from a customized database that was originally used to compare a diagnostic algorithm with a selective use of MDCT with an algorithm with routine MDCT of the spine, chest, and abdomen within the same population. In all 50 patients, routine MDCT found additional diagnoses as compared with the selective MDCT algorithm. Of all patients, paper cases were created with detailed information on clinical parameters, findings by physical examination, and radiologic findings. The cases were independently presented to three different trauma surgeons. First, the surgeons were asked for their treatment plan based upon diagnoses found by physical examination, conventional radiography, and selective MDCT alone. Subsequently they were asked for their treatment plan with knowledge of the injuries additionally found by routine MDCT. This procedure was repeated after 3 months. The agreement between and within surgeons was determined for the change of patient management because of additional findings by routine MDCT.
RESULTS: The agreement on the influence of routine MDCT findings on patient management between surgeons was moderate ([kappa] = 0.46) in the first procedure and substantial in the second ([kappa] = 0.67). The agreement within surgeons ranged from moderate ([kappa] = 0.60) to excellent ([kappa] = 0.87).
CONCLUSION: All surgeons agreed that the traumatic injuries additionally found by routine MDCT, frequently resulted in a change of treatment plan. There was a moderate-to-excellent agreement between and within surgeons that these additional findings resulted in a change of treatment plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19901671     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318189371d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  11 in total

1.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The key role of the radiologist in the management of polytrauma patients: indications for MDCT imaging in emergency radiology.

Authors:  Gerd Schueller; Mariano Scaglione; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Claudia Schueller-Weidekamm; Chiara Andreoli; Marina De Vargas Macciucca; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Cumulative radiation exposure and estimated lifetime cancer risk in multiple-injury adult patients undergoing repeated or multiple CTs.

Authors:  S Kritsaneepaiboon; A Jutiyon; A Krisanachinda
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Radiographic assessment of splenic injury without contrast: is contrast truly needed?

Authors:  Douglas R Murken; Joshua J Weis; Geoffrey C Hill; Louis H Alarcon; Matthew R Rosengart; Raquel M Forsythe; Gary T Marshall; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Incidental radiographic findings after injury: dedicated attention results in improved capture, documentation, and management.

Authors:  Jason L Sperry; Margaret S Massaro; Richard D Collage; Dederia H Nicholas; Raquel M Forsythe; Gregory A Watson; Gary T Marshall; Louis H Alarcon; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Selective computed tomography (CT) versus routine thoracoabdominal CT for high-energy blunt-trauma patients.

Authors:  Raoul Van Vugt; Frederik Keus; Digna Kool; Jaap Deunk; Michael Edwards
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-23

7.  [German trauma centers: level-dependent differences in polytrauma care regarding resources and diagnostic concepts].

Authors:  J Bayer; G Pache; T O Hammer; J Zwingmann; N P Südkamp; P C Strohm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Delays in diagnosis in early trauma care: evaluation of diagnostic efficiency and circumstances of delay.

Authors:  M Muhm; T Danko; K Schmitz; H Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Retrospective review of the use and costs of routine chest x rays in a trauma setting.

Authors:  Kristina Ziegler; James M Feeney; Colleen Desai; David Sharpio; Wiiliam T Marshall; Michael Twohig
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2013-05-09

10.  Earthquake-related crush injury versus non-earthquake injury in abdominal trauma patients on emergency multidetector computed tomography: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tian-wu Chen; Zhi-gang Yang; Zhi-hui Dong; Zhi-gang Chu; Si-shi Tang; Wen Deng
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.