Literature DB >> 19901040

Comparison between tongue volume from magnetic resonance images and tongue area from profile cephalograms.

Fabrice Liégeois1, Adelin Albert, Michel Limme.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The aim of this study was to measure lingual volume and to correlate it with and predict it from the area of the radiographic shadow of the tongue as well as with demographic and biometric characteristics. In 70 healthy subjects (35 males and 35 females) aged between 20 and 37 years, tongue volume was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Volumes were correlated with the area of the tongue on the sagittal plane determined from the lingual shadow on profile cephalometric radiographs. Demographic and biometric characteristics were also available for each subject. The mean lingual volume was 79.5 +/- 14.2 cm(3) and was gender dependent. The mean lingual volume was 89.9 +/- 11.5 and 68.9 +/- 7.0 cm(3) in males and females, respectively. Correlations between tongue volume and body height, weight, and the body mass index (BMI) were highly significant. A strong correlation (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) was found between lingual volume measured using MRI and the radiographically determined area of the lingual shadow. The associated regression line allowed the area of the lingual shadow to be used to estimate the corresponding tongue volume in individual subjects. Multiple regression analysis showed that lingual volume was best predicted by the lingual shadow, gender, age, and BMI (R(2) = 0.80).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19901040     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Morphometric development of the tongue in fetal cadavers.

Authors:  Ahmet Dursun; Yadigar Kastamonı; Demet Kacaroglu; Neslihan Yuzbasıoglu; Tolga Ertekın
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Fat accumulation in the tongue is associated with male gender, abnormal upper airway patency and whole-body adiposity.

Authors:  Ivan R B Godoy; Edgar Leonardo Martinez-Salazar; Alireza Eajazi; Pedro R Genta; Miriam A Bredella; Martin Torriani
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.694

3.  The Influence of Oropalatal Dimensions on the Measurement of Tongue Strength.

Authors:  Laura L Pitts; Julie A G Stierwalt; Carlin F Hageman; Leonard L LaPointe
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Tongue Volume in Different Dentoskeletal Patterns - A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study.

Authors:  Seema Grover; Maninder Singh Sidhu; Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Ashish Dabas; Namrata Dogra; Munish Midha
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

5.  Language statistics as a window into mental representations.

Authors:  Fritz Günther; Luca Rinaldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Evaluation of tongue volume and oral cavity capacity using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Xuefang Ding; Shoichi Suzuki; Momotoshi Shiga; Naoto Ohbayashi; Toru Kurabayashi; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Sex-Specific Intubation Biomechanics: Intubation Forces Are Greater in Male Than in Female Patients, Independent of Body Weight.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Franklin Dexter; Benjamin C Gadomski; Martin J Bucx
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-06-21

8.  Relationship between Dental Occlusion and Maximum Tongue Pressure in Preschool Children Aged 4-6 Years.

Authors:  Yumi Sasaki; Masatoshi Otsugu; Hidekazu Sasaki; Naho Fujikawa; Rena Okawa; Takafumi Kato; Kazuhiko Nakano
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22

9.  Comparison of pharyngeal airway dimension, tongue and hyoid bone position based on ANB angle.

Authors:  Ashish Chauhan; Ram Autar; Kusum Lata Pradhan; Vijeta Yadav
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

10.  Tongue volume in adults with skeletal Class III dentofacial deformities.

Authors:  N Ihan Hren; U Barbič
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.151

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.