Literature DB >> 19900939

An examination of the psychosocial factors influencing colorectal cancer patients' communication of colorectal cancer patient risk with their siblings.

Catalina Lawsin1, Katherine Duhamel, Steven Itzkowitz, Karen Brown, Helen Lim, Lina Jandorf.   

Abstract

This study examined psychosocial factors influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' communication with their first-degree relatives regarding their CRC risk. Among a sample of CRC patients who were members of a colon registry in New York (n = 127), 60% reported discussing CRC risk with their siblings. These discussions were related to the CRC patients' age of diagnosis, such that those diagnosed before age 45 years were more likely to communicate with their siblings about CRC risk. Despite advances made in CRC prevention, compliance with screening recommendations among individuals who may be at familial risk for the disease is low. Perhaps this underrepresentation reflects how CRC patients communicate with their first-degree relatives about their potential risk for the disease. This study examined the psychosocial factors influencing whether CRC patients communicate with their siblings about CRC risk. The sample included CRC patients with siblings who enrolled in a colon disease registry at a NYC metropolitan hospital. Participants completed questionnaires regarding their current psychosocial functioning, perceived risk of sibling's development of CRC, and communication of CRC risk with their siblings. Patients were predominantly Caucasian, with a mean age of 60.4 years. Of the 127 patients, 60% engaged in discussions with their siblings regarding their CRC risk. Patients diagnosed with CRC before the age of 45 years were more likely to discuss the risk of CRC with their siblings (P < 0.01). These data suggest that CRC patients may serve as an effective vehicle to promote CRC screening and support the need for health care providers to not only educate patients of the familial risk of CRC, but to also encourage these patients to communicate this information with their siblings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900939      PMCID: PMC2776737          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  18 in total

1.  Awareness of genetic testing for colorectal cancer predisposition among specialists in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Shivani Batra; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Margaret McGovern; Steven Itzkowitz; Karen Brown
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Toward a system of cancer screening in the United States: trends and opportunities.

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Helen I Meissner
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: a test of a mediational model.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Arnold Markowitz; Sidney Winawer; Jose Guillem; Neal J Meropol; Daniel Haller; Lina Jandorf; William Rakowski; James Babb; Terry Duncan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.

Authors:  A M Codori; G M Petersen; D L Miglioretti; E K Larkin; M T Bushey; C Young; J D Brensinger; K Johnson; J A Bacon; S V Booker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services.

Authors:  J E Ware; W G Manning; N Duan; K B Wells; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1984-10

6.  Underreporting of family history of colon cancer: correlates and implications.

Authors:  K Glanz; J Grove; L Le Marchand; C Gotay
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Lack of communication about familial colorectal cancer risk associated with colorectal adenomas (United States).

Authors:  K Pho; A Geller; P C Schroy
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Reasons given by relatives of colorectal cancer patients for not undergoing screening.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Mary Jane Esplen; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Colorectal cancer screening: discussions with first degree relatives.

Authors:  M A Harris; C J Treloar; J E Byles
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.939

10.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Robert A Smith; Durado Brooks; Kimberly S Andrews; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; Theodore R Levin; Perry Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  3 in total

1.  Life events may contribute to family communication about cancer risk following BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Claudia Côté; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Rosalie Corona; Joann N Bodurtha; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-06

3.  Communication by mothers with breast cancer or melanoma with their children.

Authors:  Rikki Gaber; Sapna Desai; Maureen Smith; Steve Eilers; Hanz Blatt; Yanina Guevara; June K Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.