Literature DB >> 19900649

Therapeutic interventions and success in risk factor control for secondary prevention of stroke.

Jose Alvarez-Sabin1, Manuel Quintana, Miguel Angel Hernandez-Presa, Carlos Alvarez, Jose Chaves, Marc Ribo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the success rates in achieving preventive therapeutic goals in patients who experienced an ischemic stroke (IS) and compare them with those achieved in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: This was an observational multicenter case-control study (3 patients with IS and one control subject with CAD) performed in 1444 primary health centers in Spain. Preventive therapeutic objectives according to American Heart Association guidelines were predefined. Demographic data, vascular risk factors, and success/failure in achievement of objectives were recorded and compared between patients with IS and CAD.
RESULTS: A total of 5458 patients were included, 4098 (75.1%) had IS and 1360 (24.9%) had CAD. Although more than 90% of patients with hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia were under specific drug regimens, only about 25% achieved the recommended therapeutic objective for each risk factor. Success rate was especially low among patients with IS compared with CAD: hypertension (23.8% v 27.2%; P = .028); dyslipidemia (13.6% v 20.3%; P < .001); and abdominal obesity (49.1% v 54.6%; P = .002). The only objective widely achieved in both groups was the use of antithrombotic drugs in atrial fibrillation (97.2% v 94.7%; P = .125). Only 3.3% of patients with IS had all risk factors under control, compared with 5.6% of those with CAD (P = .006). For all patients, multivariate logistic regression model showed that independent predictors of full risk factor control were: presence of CAD as compared with IS (odds ratio [OR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-3.29; P = .001), older age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04; P = .028), and having less than 3 risk factors (OR 16.98; 95% CI 9.02-31.97; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Success in achieving preventive therapeutic objectives for secondary prevention of vascular events is low, especially among patients with IS. There is an urgent need to devise strategies to improve risk factor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900649     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  10 in total

1.  Ambulatory treatment gaps in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Kari L Olson; Lisa J Lash; Thomas Delate; Michele Wood; Jon Rasmussen; Anne M Denham; John A Merenich
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

2.  [Organized Post-Stroke Care through Case Management on the Basis of a Standardized Treatment Pathway : Results of a Single-Centre Pilot Study].

Authors:  J Barlinn; K Barlinn; U Helbig; T Siepmann; L-P Pallesen; H Urban; V Pütz; J Schmitt; H Reichmann; U Bodechtel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Implementation of telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after stroke and transient ischemic attack - participation rate, reasons for nonparticipation and one-year mortality.

Authors:  Anna-Lotta Irewall; Lisa Bergström; Joachim Ogren; Katarina Laurell; Lars Söderström; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2014-02-19

4.  Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study.

Authors:  Stina Jakobsson; Anna-Lotta Irewall; Fredrik Bjorklund; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Nurse-Led, Telephone-Based, Secondary Preventive Follow-Up after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Improves Blood Pressure and LDL Cholesterol: Results from the First 12 Months of the Randomized, Controlled NAILED Stroke Risk Factor Trial.

Authors:  Anna-Lotta Irewall; Joachim Ögren; Lisa Bergström; Katarina Laurell; Lars Söderström; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  [Compliance with recommendations in secondary prevention of stroke in primary care].

Authors:  Carmen Tamayo-Ojeda; Neus Parellada-Esquius; Betlem Salvador-González; Pilar Ángeles Oriol-Torón; M Dolores Rodríguez-Garrido; Dolores Muñoz-Segura
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 1.137

7.  The NAILED stroke risk factor trial (nurse based age independent intervention to limit evolution of disease after stroke): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Mooe; Lisa Bergström; Anna-Lotta Irewall; Joachim Ogren
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The stroke east Saxony pilot project for organized post-stroke care: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ulf Bodechtel; Kristian Barlinn; Uwe Helbig; Katrin Arnold; Timo Siepmann; Lars-Peder Pallesen; Volker Puetz; Heinz Reichmann; Jochen Schmitt; Jessica Kepplinger
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Implementation of a new guideline in cardiovascular secondary preventive care: subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stina Jakobsson; Daniel Huber; Fredrik Björklund; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Long-term, telephone-based follow-up after stroke and TIA improves risk factors: 36-month results from the randomized controlled NAILED stroke risk factor trial.

Authors:  Joachim Ögren; Anna-Lotta Irewall; Lars Söderström; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.474

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.