Literature DB >> 19900576

Technical challenges in designing post-marketing eCRFs to address clinical safety and pharmacovigilance needs.

Zhengwu Lu1.   

Abstract

To identify key challenges and propose technical considerations in designing electronic case report form (eCRF) for post-marketing studies, the author undertakes a comprehensive literature review of peer reviewed and grey literature to assess the key aspects, processes, standards, recommendations, and best practices in designing eCRFs based on industry experience in designing and supporting electronic data capture (EDC) studies. Literature search using strings on MEDLINE and PUBMED returned few papers directly related to CRF design. Health informatics and general practice journals were searched and results reviewed. Many conference, government commission, health professional and special interests group websites provide relevant information from practical experience - summarization of this information is presented. Further, we presented a list of concrete technical considerations in dealing with EDC technology/system limitations based on literature assessment and industry implementation experience. It is recognized that cross-functional teams be involved in eCRF design process and decision making. To summarize the keys in designing eCRFs to address post-market study safety and pharmacovigilance needs, the first is to identify required data elements from the study protocol supporting data analyses and reporting requirements. Secondly, accepted best practices, CDASH & CDISC guidelines, and company internal or therapeutic unit standard should be considered and applied. Coding (MedDRA & WHODD) mapping should be managed and implemented as well when possible. Finally, we need to be on top of the EDC technologies, challenge the technologies, drive EDC improvement via working with vendors, and utilize the technologies to drive clinical effectiveness. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900576     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  5 in total

1.  Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; Prakash Nadkarni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Experience of using an open source clinical trials data management software system in Kenya.

Authors:  Moses M Ngari; Naomi Waithira; Roma Chilengi; Patricia Njuguna; Trudie Lang; Greg Fegan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-11-26

Review 3.  Electronic case report forms and electronic data capture within clinical trials and pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  David A Rorie; Robert W V Flynn; Kerr Grieve; Alexander Doney; Isla Mackenzie; Thomas M MacDonald; Amy Rogers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  WHODrug: A Global, Validated and Updated Dictionary for Medicinal Information.

Authors:  Olof Lagerlund; Sara Strese; Malin Fladvad; Marie Lindquist
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  Predicting the Drug Safety for Traditional Chinese Medicine through a Comparative Analysis of Withdrawn Drugs Using Pharmacological Network.

Authors:  Mengzhu Xue; Shoude Zhang; Chaoqian Cai; Xiaojuan Yu; Lei Shan; Xiaofeng Liu; Weidong Zhang; Honglin Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.