BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) infection is treated with interferon/ribavirin, but only a subset of patients respond. Treatment nonresponders have marked pretreatment up-regulation of a subset of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) in their livers, including ISG15. We here study how the nonresponder gene expression phenotype is influenced by clinical factors and uncover the cellular basis of the phenotype through ISG15 protein expression. METHODS: Seventy-eight CHC patients undergoing treatment were classified by clinical (gender, viral genotype, viral load, treatment outcome) and histologic (inflammation, fibrosis) factors and subjected to gene expression profiling on their pretreatment liver biopsies. An analysis of variance model was used to study the influence of individual factors on gene expression. ISG15 immunohistochemistry was performed on a subset of 31 liver biopsy specimens. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three genes were differentially expressed in the 78 CHC livers when compared with 20 normal livers (P < .001; fold change, > or =1.5-fold). Of genes influenced by a single factor, genotype (1 vs 2/3) influenced more genes (17) than any other variable; when treatment outcome was included in the analysis, this became the predominant influence (24 genes), and the effect of genotype was diminished. Treatment response was linked to cell-specific activation patterns: ISG15 protein up-regulation was more pronounced in hepatocytes in treatment nonresponders but in Kuppfer cells in responders. CONCLUSIONS: Genotype is a surrogate marker for the nonresponder phenotype. This phenotype manifests as differential gene expression and is driven by activation of different cell types: hepatocytes in treatment nonresponders and macrophages in treatment responders. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) infection is treated with interferon/ribavirin, but only a subset of patients respond. Treatment nonresponders have marked pretreatment up-regulation of a subset of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) in their livers, including ISG15. We here study how the nonresponder gene expression phenotype is influenced by clinical factors and uncover the cellular basis of the phenotype through ISG15 protein expression. METHODS: Seventy-eight CHCpatients undergoing treatment were classified by clinical (gender, viral genotype, viral load, treatment outcome) and histologic (inflammation, fibrosis) factors and subjected to gene expression profiling on their pretreatment liver biopsies. An analysis of variance model was used to study the influence of individual factors on gene expression. ISG15 immunohistochemistry was performed on a subset of 31 liver biopsy specimens. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three genes were differentially expressed in the 78 CHC livers when compared with 20 normal livers (P < .001; fold change, > or =1.5-fold). Of genes influenced by a single factor, genotype (1 vs 2/3) influenced more genes (17) than any other variable; when treatment outcome was included in the analysis, this became the predominant influence (24 genes), and the effect of genotype was diminished. Treatment response was linked to cell-specific activation patterns: ISG15 protein up-regulation was more pronounced in hepatocytes in treatment nonresponders but in Kuppfer cells in responders. CONCLUSIONS: Genotype is a surrogate marker for the nonresponder phenotype. This phenotype manifests as differential gene expression and is driven by activation of different cell types: hepatocytes in treatment nonresponders and macrophages in treatment responders. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Lucy Golden-Mason; Kiran M Bambha; Linling Cheng; Charles D Howell; Milton W Taylor; Paul J Clark; Nezam Afdhal; Hugo R Rosen Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: K S O'Connor; G Parnell; E Patrick; G Ahlenstiel; V Suppiah; D van der Poorten; S A Read; R Leung; M W Douglas; J Y H Yang; G J Stewart; C Liddle; J George; D R Booth Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 2.676
Authors: Andrew H Talal; Rositsa B Dimova; Eileen Z Zhang; Min Jiang; Marina S Penney; James C Sullivan; Martyn C Botfield; Ananthsrinivas Chakilam; Rishikesh Sawant; Christine M Cervini; Marija Zeremski; Ira M Jacobson; Ann D Kwong Journal: Hepatology Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Feng Qian; Christopher R Bolen; Chunxia Jing; Xiaomei Wang; Wei Zheng; Hongyu Zhao; Erol Fikrig; R Douglas Bruce; Steven H Kleinstein; Ruth R Montgomery Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2012-12-05
Authors: Nikolaos K Gatselis; Kalliopi Zachou; Asterios Saitis; Maria Samara; George N Dalekos Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Scott W Biggins; James Trotter; Jane Gralla; James R Burton; Kiran M Bambha; Jennifer Dodge; Megan Brocato; Linling Cheng; Matt McQueen; Lisa Forman; Michael Chang; Igal Kam; Gregory Everson; Richard A Spritz; Goran Klintmalm; Hugo R Rosen Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 25.083