OBJECTIVE: White blood cells are not traditionally considered to be normally present in amniotic fluid. This study was conducted after the observation that a patient with preterm labor and intact membranes had eosinophils as a predominant cell in the amniotic fluid, and had an episode of asthma during the index pregnancy. The goal of this study was to determine whether women presenting with preterm labor with eosinophils in the amniotic fluid had a different outcome than those without eosinophils as the predominant white blood cell in the amniotic cavity. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included women who presented with preterm labor and intact membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Patients underwent an amniocentesis shortly after admission for the assessment of the microbiologic status of the amniotic cavity and/or fetal lung maturity. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as genital mycoplasmas. Cytologic studies included amniotic fluid white blood cell count and differential, which was performed on cytocentrifuged specimens. Patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and/or an amniotic fluid white blood cell count >20 cells/mm(3) were excluded from the study. Cases were defined as women in whom the differential contained >20% of eosinophils. Controls were selected among women with an amniotic fluid eosinophil count <or=20% and matched for gestational age at amniocentesis. The analysis was conducted with non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 10 cases and 50 controls. Gestational age and cervical dilatation at admission were similar in both groups. Cases had a lower gestational age at delivery than controls [34.6 weeks, inter-quartile range (IQR) 32-37.3 weeks vs. 38.0 weeks, IQR 35-40 weeks, respectively; p = 0.018]. The prevalence of preterm delivery <or=35 weeks was higher among patients who had >20% eosinophils than in the control group [50% (5/10) vs. 18% (9/50), respectively; p = 0.029]. Similar results were observed for delivery at <37 weeks [cases: 70% (7/10) vs. controls: 36% (18/50); p = 0.046]. CONCLUSIONS: Women with preterm labor and intact membranes who have a large proportion of eosinophils in the amniotic fluid are at an increased risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. These patients may have had an episode of preterm labor related to a type I hypersensitivity reaction.
OBJECTIVE: White blood cells are not traditionally considered to be normally present in amniotic fluid. This study was conducted after the observation that a patient with preterm labor and intact membranes had eosinophils as a predominant cell in the amniotic fluid, and had an episode of asthma during the index pregnancy. The goal of this study was to determine whether women presenting with preterm labor with eosinophils in the amniotic fluid had a different outcome than those without eosinophils as the predominant white blood cell in the amniotic cavity. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included women who presented with preterm labor and intact membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Patients underwent an amniocentesis shortly after admission for the assessment of the microbiologic status of the amniotic cavity and/or fetal lung maturity. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as genital mycoplasmas. Cytologic studies included amniotic fluid white blood cell count and differential, which was performed on cytocentrifuged specimens. Patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and/or an amniotic fluid white blood cell count >20 cells/mm(3) were excluded from the study. Cases were defined as women in whom the differential contained >20% of eosinophils. Controls were selected among women with an amniotic fluid eosinophil count <or=20% and matched for gestational age at amniocentesis. The analysis was conducted with non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 10 cases and 50 controls. Gestational age and cervical dilatation at admission were similar in both groups. Cases had a lower gestational age at delivery than controls [34.6 weeks, inter-quartile range (IQR) 32-37.3 weeks vs. 38.0 weeks, IQR 35-40 weeks, respectively; p = 0.018]. The prevalence of preterm delivery <or=35 weeks was higher among patients who had >20% eosinophils than in the control group [50% (5/10) vs. 18% (9/50), respectively; p = 0.029]. Similar results were observed for delivery at <37 weeks [cases: 70% (7/10) vs. controls: 36% (18/50); p = 0.046]. CONCLUSIONS:Women with preterm labor and intact membranes who have a large proportion of eosinophils in the amniotic fluid are at an increased risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. These patients may have had an episode of preterm labor related to a type I hypersensitivity reaction.
Authors: R Romero; J P Kusanovic; J Espinoza; F Gotsch; C L Nhan-Chang; O Erez; C J Kim; N Khalek; P Mittal; L F Goncalves; C Schaudinn; S S Hassan; J W Costerton Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Ricardo Gomez; Roberto Romero; Jyh Kae Nien; Luis Medina; Mario Carstens; Yeon Mee Kim; Jimmy Espinoza; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Rogelio Gonzalez; Jay D Iams; Iván Rojas Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2007-02
Authors: J P Kusanovic; J Espinoza; R Romero; L F Gonçalves; J K Nien; E Soto; N Khalek; N Camacho; I Hendler; P Mittal; L A Friel; F Gotsch; O Erez; N G Than; S Mazaki-Tovi; M L Schoen; S S Hassan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Simon Phipps; Chuan En Lam; Suresh Mahalingam; Matthew Newhouse; Ruben Ramirez; Helene F Rosenberg; Paul S Foster; Klaus I Matthaei Journal: Blood Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Roberto Romero; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Bo Hyun Yoon; Moshe Mazor; Jingqin Luo; David Banks; John Ryals; Chris Beecher Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2010-05-26
Authors: Pooja Mittal; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Sorin Draghici; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John Hotra; Ricardo Gomez; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Deug-Chan Lee; Chong Jai Kim; Sonia S Hassan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Pooja Mittal; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Juan Gonzalez; Sorin Draghici; Yi Xu; Zhong Dong; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Stephen Lye; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Leonard Lipovich; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Sonia S Hassan; Sam Mesiano; Chong Jai Kim Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Roberto Romero; Eleazar Soto; Stanley M Berry; Sonia S Hassan; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Bo Hyun Yoon; Samuel Edwin; Moshe Mazor; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2011-12-20
Authors: Roberto Romero; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Andrew D Winters; Eunjung Jung; Majid Shaman; Janine Bieda; Bogdan Panaitescu; Percy Pacora; Offer Erez; Jonathan M Greenberg; Madison M Ahmad; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Kevin R Theis Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Amy S Anderson; Benjamin C Trumble; Carmen Hové; Thomas S Kraft; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven; Aaron D Blackwell Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 5.237
Authors: JoonHo Lee; Roberto Romero; Yi Xu; Jezid Miranda; Wonsuk Yoo; Piya Chaemsaithong; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Adi L Tarca; Steven J Korzeniewski; Sonia S Hassan; Nandor Gabor Than; Bo Hyun Yoon; Chong Jai Kim Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.886