Literature DB >> 19899034

The suction pseudopolyp technique: a novel method for the removal of small flat nonpolypoid lesions of the colon and rectum.

V Pattullo1, M J Bourke, K L Tran, D McLeod, S J Williams, A A Bailey, S Alexander, A Mishra, J Co.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Small flat nonpolypoid lesions of the colorectum can be technically difficult to target and completely remove; techniques such as hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization are associated with serositis, delayed bleeding, and perforation. This study aimed to describe a novel technique for the removal of such lesions and demonstrate its safety and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 - 80 years with flat nonpolypoid lesions (Paris-Japanese classification 0-IIa and 0-IIb, measuring less than 10 mm) identified at colonoscopy were included in this prospective study. The lesions were removed by the suction pseudopolyp technique (SPT): the lesion is aspirated into the suction channel of the colonoscope and continuous suction applied for 5 seconds whilst the colonoscope is gently retracted. On release of the suction, the resulting pseudopolyp containing the lesion and a margin of normal tissue is easily ensnared and resected. The primary outcomes were endoscopic completeness of polyp resection and complication rate.
RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, 1231 polyps were removed during 2656 colonoscopies; 126 polyps (in 101 patients) met inclusion criteria. Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 100 % of the polyps, without immediate or delayed complication. Of the resected lesions, 57 % had malignant potential (adenomas 47 % and sessile serrated lesions 10 %); a higher proportion of lesions removed from the right colon had malignant potential compared with those from the left colon (75 % vs. 41 %, P = 0.0066).
CONCLUSIONS: Diminutive flat lesions of the colorectum are predominantly adenomas and sessile serrated lesions. SPT is a safe, effective, and reproducible therapy for removal of these lesions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19899034     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

1.  Advances in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Tutticci; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  Management of Serrated Polyps of the Colon.

Authors:  Claire Fan; Adam Younis; Christine E Bookhout; Seth D Crockett
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

3.  Traction-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for polypectomy in the large intestine.

Authors:  Bernhard Dauser; Thomas Winkler; Behrooz Salehi; Stefan Riss; Franz Beer; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect.

Authors:  Michael X Ma; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 5.  British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum.

Authors:  James E East; Wendy S Atkin; Adrian C Bateman; Susan K Clark; Sunil Dolwani; Shara N Ket; Simon J Leedham; Perminder S Phull; Matt D Rutter; Neil A Shepherd; Ian Tomlinson; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Toshiki Yamamoto; Sho Suzuki; Chika Kusano; Kyoko Yakabe; Maho Iwamoto; Hisatomo Ikehara; Takuji Gotoda; Mitsuhiko Moriyama
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.485

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.