BACKGROUND: Because the hepatic portal system may not be the optimal site for islet transplantation, several extrahepatic sites have been studied. Here, we examine an intramuscular transplantation site, bioengineered to better support islet neovascularization, engraftment, and survival, and we demonstrate that at this novel site, grafted beta cell mass may be quantitated in a real-time noninvasive manner by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. METHODS: Streptozotocin-induced rats were pretreated intramuscularly with a biocompatible angiogenic scaffold received syngeneic islet transplants 2 weeks later. The recipients were monitored serially by blood glucose and glucose tolerance measurements and by PET imaging of the transplant site with [11C] dihydrotetrabenazine. Parallel histopathologic evaluation of the grafts was performed using insulin staining and evaluation of microvasularity. RESULTS: Reversal of hyperglycemia by islet transplantation was most successful in recipients pretreated with bioscaffolds containing angiogenic factors when compared with those who received no bioscaffolds or bioscaffolds not treated with angiogenic factors. PET imaging with [11C] dihydrotetrabenazine, insulin staining, and microvascular density patterns were consistent with islet survival, increased levels of angiogenesis, and with reversal of hyperglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of increased neovascularization at an intramuscular site significantly improves islet transplant engraftment and survival compared with controls. The use of a nonhepatic transplant site may avoid intrahepatic complications and permit the use of PET imaging to measure and follow transplanted beta cell mass in real time. These findings have important implications for effective islet implantation outside of the liver and offer promising possibilities for improving islet survival, monitoring, and even prevention of islet loss.
BACKGROUND: Because the hepatic portal system may not be the optimal site for islet transplantation, several extrahepatic sites have been studied. Here, we examine an intramuscular transplantation site, bioengineered to better support islet neovascularization, engraftment, and survival, and we demonstrate that at this novel site, grafted beta cell mass may be quantitated in a real-time noninvasive manner by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. METHODS:Streptozotocin-induced rats were pretreated intramuscularly with a biocompatible angiogenic scaffold received syngeneic islet transplants 2 weeks later. The recipients were monitored serially by blood glucose and glucose tolerance measurements and by PET imaging of the transplant site with [11C] dihydrotetrabenazine. Parallel histopathologic evaluation of the grafts was performed using insulin staining and evaluation of microvasularity. RESULTS: Reversal of hyperglycemia by islet transplantation was most successful in recipients pretreated with bioscaffolds containing angiogenic factors when compared with those who received no bioscaffolds or bioscaffolds not treated with angiogenic factors. PET imaging with [11C] dihydrotetrabenazine, insulin staining, and microvascular density patterns were consistent with islet survival, increased levels of angiogenesis, and with reversal of hyperglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of increased neovascularization at an intramuscular site significantly improves islet transplant engraftment and survival compared with controls. The use of a nonhepatic transplant site may avoid intrahepatic complications and permit the use of PET imaging to measure and follow transplanted beta cell mass in real time. These findings have important implications for effective islet implantation outside of the liver and offer promising possibilities for improving islet survival, monitoring, and even prevention of islet loss.
Authors: A M Shapiro; E G Hao; J R Lakey; W J Yakimets; T A Churchill; P G Mitlianga; G K Papadopoulos; J F Elliott; R V Rajotte; N M Kneteman Journal: Transplantation Date: 2001-06-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Suzan T M Nillesen; Paul J Geutjes; Ronnie Wismans; Joost Schalkwijk; Willeke F Daamen; Toin H van Kuppevelt Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2006-11-20 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: M Kantlehner; P Schaffner; D Finsinger; J Meyer; A Jonczyk; B Diefenbach; B Nies; G Hölzemann; S L Goodman; H Kessler Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2000-08-18 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Yoshifumi Saisho; Paul E Harris; Alexandra E Butler; Ryan Galasso; Tatyana Gurlo; Robert A Rizza; Peter C Butler Journal: J Mol Histol Date: 2008-09-13 Impact factor: 2.611
Authors: Daniel T Bowers; Claire E Olingy; Preeti Chhabra; Linda Langman; Parker H Merrill; Ritu S Linhart; Michael L Tanes; Dan Lin; Kenneth L Brayman; Edward A Botchwey Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Hugo P Sondermeijer; Piotr Witkowski; Tetsunori Seki; Arnoud van der Laarse; Silviu Itescu; Mark A Hardy Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Matthew J Webber; Omar F Khan; Stefanie A Sydlik; Benjamin C Tang; Robert Langer Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 3.934