Literature DB >> 19897825

Home cage testing of delay discounting in rats.

S Koot1, W Adriani, L Saso, R van den Bos, G Laviola.   

Abstract

Testing rodents in their home cages has become increasingly popular. Since human intervention, handling, and transport are minimized, behavior can be recorded undisturbed and continuously. Currently existing home cage systems are too complex if only relatively simple operant-learning tests are to be carried out in rats. For that purpose, a new low-cost computer-controlled operant panel was designed, which can be placed inside the home cage. A pilot study was carried out, using an intolerance-to-delay protocol, classically developed for testing behavioral impulsivity. Male adult rats were tested in their home cages, containing the operant panel provided with nose-poking holes. Nose poking in one hole resulted in the immediate delivery of one food pellet (small-soon, SS), whereas nose poking in the other hole delivered five food pellets after a delay (large-late), which was increased progressively each day (0-150 sec). The two daily sessions, spaced 8 h apart, lasted 1 h each, and the time-out after food delivery was 90 sec. A clear-cut shift toward preference for SS, which is considered a classical index of cognitive impulsivity, was shown at the longest delay. It is noteworthy that rats shifted when the delay interval was longer than the mean intertrial interval-that is, when they experienced more than one delay-equivalent odds against discounting (see Adriani & Laviola, 2006). The shortened training (2 days) and testing (5 days) phases, as allowed by prolonged and multiple daily sessions, can be advantageous in testing rodents during selected short phases of development. Current research is focusing on further validation of this and similar protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19897825     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  7 in total

1.  Delay discounting in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice: adolescent-limited and life-persistent patterns of impulsivity.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pinkston; R J Lamb
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Females in the forefront: time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice and interval timing in female rats.

Authors:  Sarah L Stuebing; Andrew T Marshall; Ashton Triplett; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Rodent versions of the iowa gambling task: opportunities and challenges for the understanding of decision-making.

Authors:  Leonie de Visser; Judith R Homberg; Manuela Mitsogiannis; Fiona D Zeeb; Marion Rivalan; Aurélie Fitoussi; Vasco Galhardo; Ruud van den Bos; Catherine A Winstanley; Françoise Dellu-Hagedorn
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  A rodent version of the Iowa Gambling Task: 7 years of progress.

Authors:  Ruud van den Bos; Susanne Koot; Leonie de Visser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-18

Review 5.  Nonhuman gamblers: lessons from rodents, primates, and robots.

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Elsa Addessi; Francesca De Petrillo; Giovanni Laviola; Marco Mirolli; Domenico Parisi; Giancarlo Petrosino; Marialba Ventricelli; Francesca Zoratto; Walter Adriani
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Individual differences in gambling proneness among rats and common marmosets: an automated choice task.

Authors:  Francesca Zoratto; Emma Sinclair; Arianna Manciocco; Augusto Vitale; Giovanni Laviola; Walter Adriani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Maturational delay and asymmetric information flow of brain connectivity in SHR model of ADHD revealed by topological analysis of metabolic networks.

Authors:  Seunggyun Ha; Hyekyoung Lee; Yoori Choi; Hyejin Kang; Se Jin Jeon; Jong Hoon Ryu; Hee Jin Kim; Jae Hoon Cheong; Seonhee Lim; Bung-Nyun Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.