Literature DB >> 19897688

Oral calcium supplements do not affect the progression of aortic valve calcification or coronary artery calcification.

Mayurkumar Bhakta1, Charles Bruce, David Messika-Zeitoun, Lawrence Bielak, Patrick F Sheedy, Patricia Peyser, Maurice Sarano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of oral calcium supplementation among the elderly for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia is increasing. The incidence of aortic valve disease and coronary artery disease also is increasing. No study thus far has been done to demonstrate whether this affects the progression of calcification in both the valves and vasculature. We sought to determine whether ingestion of oral calcium supplementation has an effect on aortic valve calcification (AVC) and coronary artery calcification (CAC).
METHODS: We performed an independent assessment of AVC, CAC, and calcium supplementation among patients enrolled in the Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Calcification study who were >60 years of age and had baseline and 4-year follow-up AVC data. In this population-based study of Olmsted County (Minnesota) residents, AVC and CAC scores were determined prospectively by electron beam computed tomography. We evaluated baseline demographic data and analyzed whether those patients using calcium supplementation had a higher rate of progression of both AVC and CAC.
RESULTS: We identified 257 patients (mean age, 67.8+/-5.2 years), 144 of whom were women. Twenty-five patients (all women) reported using calcium supplements. Analysis of the 144 women (25 taking calcium supplementation) showed there was no difference in the progression of AVC (mean difference in baseline and follow-up AVC score; no supplement versus supplement, 30+/-9 vs 39+/-28; P=.73) or CAC (mean difference in baseline and follow-up CAC score; no supplement vs supplement, 47+/-15 vs 112+/-22; P=.154). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to baseline AVC, serum calcium, renal function, diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol, or body mass index.
CONCLUSION: In this community-based observational study with a 4-year follow-up, no significant increased progression of AVC or CAC was found in women taking oral calcium supplementation. Larger prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19897688     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.080217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  5 in total

1.  Effects of a typical acute oral calcium load on arterial properties and endothelial function in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Yaron; V Roach; E Izkhakov; M Ish-Shalom; J Sack; Y Sofer; I Azzam; A Ray; N Stern; K M Tordjman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Is excess calcium harmful to health?

Authors:  Robin M Daly; Peter R Ebeling
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Calcium Intake From Diet and Supplements and the Risk of Coronary Artery Calcification and its Progression Among Older Adults: 10-Year Follow-up of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  John J B Anderson; Bridget Kruszka; Joseph A C Delaney; Ka He; Gregory L Burke; Alvaro Alonso; Diane E Bild; Matthew Budoff; Erin D Michos
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Calcium intake in health maintenance - a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsti Uusi-Rasi; Merja U M Kärkkäinen; Christel J E Lamberg-Allardt
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Pharmacological and Nutritional Modulation of Vascular Calcification.

Authors:  Liv M Vossen; Abraham A Kroon; Leon J Schurgers; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.