Literature DB >> 19897061

Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors influencing survival following esophagectomy for cancer.

Reza Mirnezami1, Ashish Rohatgi, Robert P Sutcliffe, Ahmed Hamouda, Kandiah Chandrakumaran, Abrie Botha, Robert C Mason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of clinicopathological characteristics can influence survival following esophagectomy for cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting survival in a consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer at a single tertiary centre over a 7 year period. MATERIALS &
METHODS: We analyzed a prospective database of 314 consecutive patients (247 males and 67 females), with a mean age of 62.8 +/- 9.1 years, who underwent esophagectomy for cancer at a single, high-volume centre between January 2000 and June 2007. The impact of 11 variables on survival following esophagectomy was determined by univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, gender, ASA grade, blood transfusion, type of cancer, tumor stage, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), longitudinal resection margin (LRM) involvement and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement were significant (p<0.05) negative factors for survival. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that the only independent factors negatively impacting on survival were ASA grade (p=0.012), tumor stage (p=0.009), LVI (p=0.009) and LRM involvement (p=0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: In the current study we demonstrated that independent variables effecting survival after esophagectomy for cancer were ASA grade, tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion and longitudinal resection margin involvement. Contrary to other studies we did not find CRM involvement to be an independent predictor for survival. Copyright 2009 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19897061     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  7 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of detection of lymphovascular invasion in primary melanoma using endothelial markers D2-40 and CD34.

Authors:  Amy E Rose; Paul J Christos; Dan Lackaye; Richard L Shapiro; Russell Berman; Madhu Mazumdar; Hideko Kamino; Iman Osman; Farbod Darvishian
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography.

Authors:  T D Reid; D S Y Chan; S A Roberts; T D L Crosby; G T Williams; W G Lewis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J B Hulshoff; Z Faiz; A Karrenbeld; G Kats-Ugurlu; J G M Burgerhof; J K Smit; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Adjuvant Therapy for a Microscopically Incomplete Resection Margin after an Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Qiu; JiaXiang Li; Bin Wang; ZhiQiang Wang; Ying Liang; Peiqiang Cai; ZhaoLin Chen; MengZhong Liu; JianHua Fu; Hong Yang; Hui Liu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Epidural analgesia and avoidance of blood transfusion are associated with reduced mortality in patients with postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracotomic esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 335 patients.

Authors:  Kai B Kaufmann; Wolfgang Baar; Torben Glatz; Jens Hoeppner; Hartmut Buerkle; Ulrich Goebel; Sebastian Heinrich
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Meta-analysis of the influence of a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  R Evans; J R Bundred; P Kaur; J Hodson; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-06-25

7.  What are the independent prognostic factors in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Sermin Alcan; Makbule Ergin; Hakan Keskin; Abdullah Erdoğan
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 0.332

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.