Literature DB >> 19896683

Cavitation microstreaming and stress fields created by microbubbles.

James Collis1, Richard Manasseh, Petar Liovic, Paul Tho, Andrew Ooi, Karolina Petkovic-Duran, Yonggang Zhu.   

Abstract

Cavitation microstreaming plays a role in the therapeutic action of microbubbles driven by ultrasound, such as the sonoporative and sonothrombolytic phenomena. Microscopic particle-image velocimetry experiments are presented. Results show that many different microstreaming patterns are possible around a microbubble when it is on a surface, albeit for microbubbles much larger than used in clinical practice. Each pattern is associated with a particular oscillation mode of the bubble, and changing between patterns is achieved by changing the sound frequency. Each microstreaming pattern also generates different shear stress and stretch/compression distributions in the vicinity of a bubble on a wall. Analysis of the micro-PIV results also shows that ultrasound-driven microstreaming flows around bubbles are feasible mechanisms for mixing therapeutic agents into the surrounding blood, as well as assisting sonoporative delivery of molecules across cell membranes. Patterns show significant variations around the bubble, suggesting sonoporation may be either enhanced or inhibited in different zones across a cellular surface. Thus, alternating the patterns may result in improved sonoporation and sonothrombolysis. The clear and reproducible delineation of microstreaming patterns based on driving frequency makes frequency-based pattern alternation a feasible alternative to the clinically less desirable practice of increasing sound pressure for equivalent sonoporative or sonothrombolytic effect. Surface divergence is proposed as a measure relevant to sonoporation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896683     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  56 in total

1.  Cationic versus neutral microbubbles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in cancer.

Authors:  David S Wang; Cedric Panje; Marybeth A Pysz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Jarrett Rosenberg; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Michel Schneider; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Volumetric quantification of in vitro sonothrombolysis with microbubbles using high-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jong S Kim; Jonathan E Leeman; Larry Kagemann; Francois T H Yu; Xucai Chen; John J Pacella; Joel S Schuman; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Kang Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Applications of Focused Ultrasound in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; M Yashar S Kalani; Kaan Yagmurlu; Pedro Norat; Massimiliano Del Bene; Francesco DiMeco; Neal F Kassell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  The influence of distance between microbubbles on the fluid flow produced during ultrasound exposure.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schutt; Stuart D Ibsen; William Thrift; Sadik C Esener
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tunable microfluidic standing air bubbles and its application in acoustic microstreaming.

Authors:  Jixiao Liu; Bowen Li; Tong Zhu; Yidi Zhou; Shanshan Li; Shijie Guo; Tiejun Li
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Layered acoustofluidic resonators for the simultaneous optical and acoustic characterisation of cavitation dynamics, microstreaming, and biological effects.

Authors:  V Pereno; M Aron; O Vince; C Mannaris; A Seth; M de Saint Victor; G Lajoinie; M Versluis; C Coussios; D Carugo; E Stride
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 7.  Sonothrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Guillaume Bouchoux; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Clot retraction affects the extent of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in an ex vivo porcine thrombosis model.

Authors:  Jonathan T Sutton; Nikolas M Ivancevich; Stephen R Perrin; Deborah C Vela; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Ultrasound for molecular imaging and therapy in cancer.

Authors:  Osamu F Kaneko; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-06

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jonathan T Sutton; Kevin J Haworth; Gail Pyne-Geithman; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.