OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of biofeedback therapy on the residual urine volume in children with dysfunctional voiding. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in children with dysfunctional voiding associated with abnormal postvoid residual urine (PVR) from June 2002 to 2007. The children were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with standard urotherapy combined with biofeedback therapy and group 2 was treated with only standard urotherapy. The outcomes of uroflow-electromyography pattern, urinary tract infection (UTI), and PVR were recorded before and at the end of sixth month of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were enrolled in this study. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 62 and 32 patients, respectively. The voiding pattern became normal in 80.6% (50/62) and 56.2% (18/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The PVR resolved in 40 of 62 (64.5%) patients in group 1 and in 11 of 32 (34.4%) children in group 2. Before the treatment, UTI was noted in 22.5% of patients (14/62) in group 1 and 21.8% of patients (7/32) in group 2. After the treatment, UTI was observed in 3.2% of patients (2/62) and in 9.3% (3/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although both treatment modalities changed the voiding pattern, rate of febrile UTI, and PVR positively, these outcomes were better in a combination group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of standard urotherapy with the biofeedback therapy improved the results significantly. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of biofeedback therapy on the residual urine volume in children with dysfunctional voiding. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in children with dysfunctional voiding associated with abnormal postvoid residual urine (PVR) from June 2002 to 2007. The children were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with standard urotherapy combined with biofeedback therapy and group 2 was treated with only standard urotherapy. The outcomes of uroflow-electromyography pattern, urinary tract infection (UTI), and PVR were recorded before and at the end of sixth month of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were enrolled in this study. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 62 and 32 patients, respectively. The voiding pattern became normal in 80.6% (50/62) and 56.2% (18/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The PVR resolved in 40 of 62 (64.5%) patients in group 1 and in 11 of 32 (34.4%) children in group 2. Before the treatment, UTI was noted in 22.5% of patients (14/62) in group 1 and 21.8% of patients (7/32) in group 2. After the treatment, UTI was observed in 3.2% of patients (2/62) and in 9.3% (3/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although both treatment modalities changed the voiding pattern, rate of febrile UTI, and PVR positively, these outcomes were better in a combination group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of standard urotherapy with the biofeedback therapy improved the results significantly. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Turgay Ebiloglu; Engin Kaya; Burak Kopru; Giray Ergin; Soykan Sahin; Hasan Cem Irkilata; Yusuf Kibar Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2016-07-01
Authors: Adem Altunkol; Deniz Abat; Nevzat Can Sener; Mehmet Gulum; Halil Ciftci; Murat Savas; Ercan Yeni Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2018 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.541