Literature DB >> 19896006

External fixation of distal radius fractures: effect of distraction and duration.

John T Capo1, William Rossy, Patrick Henry, Robert J Maurer, Sanjiv Naidu, Linda Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of the amount of distraction across the wrist and the duration of fixator placement on the clinical outcome of patients with distal radius fractures treated with external fixation.
METHODS: A total of 42 patients with closed distal radius fractures were treated with a spanning external fixator plus supplementary percutaneous K-wires over a 6-year period. All fractures were extra-articular (A type) or simple intra-articular (C type). Twenty-four of these patients were evaluated retrospectively for clinical and radiographic outcomes at an average follow-up time of 22 months (range, 4-49 months). The amount of distraction attained by the fixator was determined by measuring the carpal height ratio on plain radiographs. Wrist and forearm range of motion were recorded, as well as grip and pinch strength. Standard radiographs were taken to evaluate healing and bony alignment.
RESULTS: Using the Gartland Werley classification, there were 11 excellent, 10 good, and 3 fair results. Statistical analysis indicated that a higher carpal height ratio at the initial reduction positively correlated (p = .041) with an excellent outcome. Duration of external fixation did not have a significant impact on the final outcome within the parameters studied (p = .891). Average wrist range of motion at follow-up was as follows: flexion, 54.1 degrees (75% of the contralateral side); extension, 59.0 degrees (78%); radial deviation, 18.0 degrees (85%); ulnar deviation, 22 degrees (73%); pronation, 79.0 degrees (95%); and supination, 76.6 degrees (93%). None of the individual components of range of motion were negatively correlated with higher carpal height ratio at fixator application or duration of fixation, within the parameters studied.
CONCLUSIONS: Moderately increased distraction of the carpus at the initial fracture reduction is correlated with improved clinical outcome and does not have an adverse affect on subsequent wrist range of motion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is the external fixator yet useful for treating fractures of the distal radius?

Authors:  Michel Rongières
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-04

2.  Strain as a Function of Time in Extrinsic Wrist Ligaments Tensioned Through External Fixation.

Authors:  Joseph P Rectenwald; K Ashley Bentley; Peter M Murray; Subrata Saha
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  The Declining Use of Wrist-Spanning External Fixators.

Authors:  Venus Vakhshori; Alexis D Rounds; Nathanael Heckmann; Ali Azad; Jessica M Intravia; Santano Rosario; Milan Stevanovic; Alidad Ghiassi
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-07

4.  Primary Wrist Hemiarthroplasty for Irreparable Distal Radius Fracture in the Independent Elderly.

Authors:  Guillaume Herzberg; Marion Burnier; Antoine Marc; Yadar Izem
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2015-08

Review 5.  Review of Internal Radiocarpal Distraction Plating for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Venus Vakhshori; Ram Kiran Alluri; Milan Stevanovic; Alidad Ghiassi
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.