Literature DB >> 19895977

Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.

Iain C Field1, Mark G Meekan, Rik C Buckworth, Corey J A Bradshaw.   

Abstract

Marine biodiversity worldwide is under increasing threat, primarily as a result of over-harvesting, pollution and climate change. Chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, rays and chimaeras) have a perceived higher intrinsic risk of extinction compared to other fish. Direct fishing mortality has driven many declines, even though some smaller fisheries persist without associated declines. Mixed-species fisheries are of particular concern, as is illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. The lack of specific management and reporting mechanisms for the latter means that many chondrichthyans might already be susceptible to extinction from stochastic processes entirely unrelated to fishing pressure itself. Chondrichthyans might also suffer relatively more than other marine taxa from the effects of fishing and habitat loss and degradation given coastal habitat use for specific life stages. The effects of invasive species and pollution are as yet too poorly understood to predict their long-term role in affecting chondrichthyan population sizes. The spatial distribution of threatened chondrichthyan species under World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List criteria are clustered mainly in (1) south-eastern South America; (2) western Europe and the Mediterranean; (3) western Africa; (4) South China Sea and Southeast Asia and (5) south-eastern Australia. To determine which ecological and life history traits predispose chondrichthyans to being IUCN Red-Listed, and to examine the role of particular human activities in exacerbating threat risk, we correlated extant marine species' Red List categorisation with available ecological (habitat type, temperature preference), life history (body length, range size) and human-relationship (whether commercially or game-fished, considered dangerous to humans) variables. Threat risk correlations were constructed using generalised linear mixed-effect models to account for phylogenetic relatedness. We also contrasted results for chondrichthyans to marine teleosts to test explicitly whether the former group is intrinsically more susceptible to extinction than fishes in general. Around 52% of chondrichthyans have been Red-Listed compared to only 8% of all marine teleosts; however, listed teleosts were in general placed more frequently into the higher-risk categories relative to chondrichthyans. IUCN threat risk in both taxa was positively correlated with body size and negatively correlated albeit weakly, with geographic range size. Even after accounting for the positive influence of size, Red-Listed teleosts were still more likely than chondrichthyans to be classified as threatened. We suggest that while sharks might not have necessarily experienced the same magnitude of deterministic decline as Red-Listed teleosts, their larger size and lower fecundity (not included in the analysis) predispose chondrichthyans to a higher risk of extinction overall. Removal of these large predators can elicit trophic cascades and destabilise the relative abundance of smaller species. Predator depletions can lead to permanent shifts in marine communities and alternate equilibrium states. Climate change might influence the phenology and physiology of some species, with the most probable response being changes in the timing of migrations and shifts in distribution. The synergistic effects among harvesting, habitat changes and climate-induced forcings are greatest for coastal chondrichthyans with specific habitat requirements and these are currently the most likely candidates for extinction. Management of shark populations must take into account the rate at which drivers of decline affect specific species. Only through the detailed collection of data describing demographic rates, habitat affinities, trophic linkages and geographic ranges, and how environmental stressors modify these, can extinction risk be more precisely estimated and reduced. The estimation of minimum viable population sizes, below which rapid extinction is more likely due to stochastic processes, is an important component of this endeavour and should accompany many of the current approaches used in shark management worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19895977     DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2881(09)56004-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mar Biol        ISSN: 0065-2881            Impact factor:   5.143


  16 in total

1.  Population declines of tuna and relatives depend on their speed of life.

Authors:  M J Juan-Jordá; I Mosqueira; J Freire; N K Dulvy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Biological responses of sharks to ocean acidification.

Authors:  Rui Rosa; Jodie L Rummer; Philip L Munday
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Early-life exposure to climate change impairs tropical shark survival.

Authors:  Rui Rosa; Miguel Baptista; Vanessa M Lopes; Maria Rita Pegado; José Ricardo Paula; Katja Trübenbach; Miguel Costa Leal; Ricardo Calado; Tiago Repolho
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Residency and spatial use by reef sharks of an isolated seamount and its implications for conservation.

Authors:  Adam Barnett; Kátya G Abrantes; Jamie Seymour; Richard Fitzpatrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identification of rays through DNA barcoding: an application for ecologists.

Authors:  Florencia Cerutti-Pereyra; Mark G Meekan; Nu-Wei V Wei; Owen O'Shea; Corey J A Bradshaw; Chris M Austin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ocean warming impairs the predator avoidance behaviour of elasmobranch embryos.

Authors:  Daniel M Ripley; Sara De Giorgio; Kirstin Gaffney; Lowri Thomas; Holly A Shiels
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  Recent expansion of marine protected areas matches with home range of grey reef sharks.

Authors:  Lucas Bonnin; David Mouillot; Germain Boussarie; William D Robbins; Jeremy J Kiszka; Laurent Dagorn; Laurent Vigliola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genetic network and breeding patterns of a sicklefin lemon shark (Negaprion acutidens) population in the Society Islands, French Polynesia.

Authors:  Johann Mourier; Nicolas Buray; Jennifer K Schultz; Eric Clua; Serge Planes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Population expansion and genetic structure in Carcharhinus brevipinna in the southern Indo-Pacific.

Authors:  Pascal T Geraghty; Jane E Williamson; William G Macbeth; Sabine P Wintner; Alastair V Harry; Jennifer R Ovenden; Michael R Gillings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid and chitin/chitosan production using marine waste sources: characteristics, applications and eco-friendly processes: a review.

Authors:  José Antonio Vázquez; Isabel Rodríguez-Amado; María Ignacia Montemayor; Javier Fraguas; María Del Pilar González; Miguel Anxo Murado
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.