Literature DB >> 19895975

Chapter 2. Vulnerability of marine turtles to climate change.

Elvira S Poloczanska1, Colin J Limpus, Graeme C Hays.   

Abstract

Marine turtles are generally viewed as vulnerable to climate change because of the role that temperature plays in the sex determination of embryos, their long life history, long age-to-maturity and their highly migratory nature. Extant species of marine turtles probably arose during the mid-late Jurassic period (180-150 Mya) so have survived past shifts in climate, including glacial periods and warm events and therefore have some capacity for adaptation. The present-day rates of increase of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and associated temperature changes, are very rapid; the capacity of marine turtles to adapt to this rapid change may be compromised by their relatively long generation times. We consider the evidence and likely consequences of present-day trends of climate change on marine turtles. Impacts are likely to be complex and may be positive as well as negative. For example, rising sea levels and increased storm intensity will negatively impact turtle nesting beaches; however, extreme storms can also lead to coastal accretion. Alteration of wind patterns and ocean currents will have implications for juveniles and adults in the open ocean. Warming temperatures are likely to impact directly all turtle life stages, such as the sex determination of embryos in the nest and growth rates. Warming of 2 degrees C could potentially result in a large shift in sex ratios towards females at many rookeries, although some populations may be resilient to warming if female biases remain within levels where population success is not impaired. Indirectly, climate change is likely to impact turtles through changes in food availability. The highly migratory nature of turtles and their ability to move considerable distances in short periods of time should increase their resilience to climate change. However, any such resilience of marine turtles to climate change is likely to be severely compromised by other anthropogenic influences. Development of coastlines may threaten nesting beaches and reproductive success, and pollution and eutrophication is threatening important coastal foraging habitats for turtles worldwide. Exploitation and bycatch in other fisheries has seriously reduced marine turtle populations. The synergistic effects of other human-induced stressors may seriously reduce the capacity of some turtle populations to adapt to the current rates of climate change. Conservation recommendations to increase the capacity of marine turtle populations to adapt to climate change include increasing population resilience, for example by the use of turtle exclusion devices in fisheries, protection of nesting beaches from the viewpoints of both conservation and coastal management, and increased international conservation efforts to protect turtles in regions where there is high unregulated or illegal fisheries (including turtle harvesting). Increasing research efforts on the critical knowledge gaps of processes influencing population numbers, such as identifying ocean foraging hotspots or the processes that underlie the initiation of nesting migrations and selection of breeding areas, will inform adaptive management in a changing climate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19895975     DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2881(09)56002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mar Biol        ISSN: 0065-2881            Impact factor:   5.143


  17 in total

1.  Ontogenetic development of migration: Lagrangian drift trajectories suggest a new paradigm for sea turtles.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Sabrina Fossette; Kostas A Katselidis; Patrizio Mariani; Gail Schofield
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Heritable variation in heat shock gene expression: a potential mechanism for adaptation to thermal stress in embryos of sea turtles.

Authors:  J N Tedeschi; W J Kennington; J L Tomkins; O Berry; S Whiting; M G Meekan; N J Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Phenological response of sea turtles to environmental variation across a species' northern range.

Authors:  Antonios D Mazaris; Athanasios S Kallimanis; John D Pantis; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Impact of marine heatwaves for sea turtle nest temperatures.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; William J Chivers; Jacques-Olivier Laloë; Charles Sheppard; Nicole Esteban
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Incubation temperature, morphology and performance in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtle hatchlings from Mon Repos, Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Sim; David T Booth; Colin J Limpus
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Under what conditions do climate-driven sex ratios enhance versus diminish population persistence?

Authors:  Maria Boyle; Jim Hone; Lisa E Schwanz; Arthur Georges
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Are thermal barriers "higher" in deep sea turtle nests?

Authors:  Pilar Santidrián Tomillo; Luis Fonseca; Frank V Paladino; James R Spotila; Daniel Oro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A 20-year investigation of declining leatherback hatching success: implications of climate variation.

Authors:  Anthony R Rafferty; Christopher P Johnstone; Jeanne A Garner; Richard D Reina
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Predicting the impacts of sea level rise in sea turtle nesting habitat on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.

Authors:  Callie A Veelenturf; Elizabeth M Sinclair; Frank V Paladino; Shaya Honarvar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Seasonal heterogeneity of ocean warming: a mortality sink for ectotherm colonizers.

Authors:  Fulvio Maffucci; Raffaele Corrado; Luigi Palatella; Marco Borra; Salvatore Marullo; Sandra Hochscheid; Guglielmo Lacorata; Daniele Iudicone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.