Literature DB >> 19895364

Population-based health-economic evaluation of the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in Finland.

Erkki J O Soini1, Glenn Davies, Janne A Martikainen, Henry X Hu, Kaan Tunceli, Leo Niskanen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of generic atorvastatin 20 mg (A20), branded rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10), generic simvastatin 40 mg (S40) and the combination of generic S40 + branded ezetimibe 10 mg (S40 + EZ10) for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) in Finnish patients not meeting the target goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with S40. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model was employed to evaluate the costs and health outcomes of the different therapies based on the cardiovascular events avoided. The model included Framingham risk equations, Finnish population characteristics, event rates, quality of life estimates, resource use and unit costs. The LDL-C lowering efficacies were gathered from a systematic literature review, based on a search of Medline carried out in June 2008 (no time limit). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and incremental cost per life year gained (LYG).
RESULTS: The efficacy (LDL-C decrease) gained from switching S40 to S40 + EZ10 was consistent in the literature review, whereas the LDL-C decrease gained from switching S40 to A20/R10 was uncertain. The incremental cost per QALY gained from switching generic S40 was lowest for S40 + EZ10 (22,841 euros [24,017 euros] and 26,595 euros [46,686 euros] for diabetic and non-diabetic men [women], respectively). The respective incremental cost per QALY gained for S40 + EZ10 vs. A20 were 19,738 euros (21,405 euros) and 23,596 euros (40,087 euros). A20 dominated R10. Based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier with a willingness-to-pay value of 30,000 euros per QALY gained, the probability of cost-effectiveness for switching generic S40 to S40 + EZ10 was 100% for men and diabetic women. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were robust.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Finnish secondary prevention population that is not at goal on S40, switching generic S40 to S40 + EZ10 is more cost-effective than switching S40 to generic A20 or R10.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19895364     DOI: 10.1185/03007990903422620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cholesterol-lowering drugs: science and marketing.

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Novel Treatment Strategies for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness.

Authors:  Clara Marquina; Ella Zomer; Sandra Vargas-Torres; Sophia Zoungas; Richard Ofori-Asenso; Danny Liew; Zanfina Ademi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic evaluation of ezetimibe combined with simvastatin for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  F van Nooten; G M Davies; J W Jukema; A H Liem; E Yap; X H Hu
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Health economic consequences of reducing salt intake and replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat in the adult Finnish population: estimates based on the FINRISK and FINDIET studies.

Authors:  J A Martikainen; E J O Soini; D E Laaksonen; L Niskanen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Primary-care-based episodes of care and their costs in a three-month follow-up in Finland.

Authors:  J Heinonen; T H Koskela; E Soini; O P Ryynänen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Ezetimibe plus statin lipid-lowering therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.

Authors:  Akhil Sasidharan; Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; S Sajith Kumar; Kayala Venkata Jagadeesh; Meenakumari Natarajan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Systematic Review of Validity Assessments of Framingham Risk Score Results in Health Economic Modelling of Lipid-Modifying Therapies in Europe.

Authors:  Jonas Hermansson; Thomas Kahan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Modeled Health Economic Impact of a Hypothetical Certolizumab Pegol Risk-Sharing Scheme for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Finland.

Authors:  Erkki Soini; Christian Asseburg; Maarit Taiha; Kari Puolakka; Oana Purcaru; Riitta Luosujärvi
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.845

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.