Bruce Ovbiagele1, Jeffrey L Saver. 1. Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, UCLA Medical Center, and Department of Neurology, Olive View - UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. ovibes@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The time point generally recognized as most appropriate to assess final functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke is 3 months. However, identifying earlier reliable prognostic time points may allay patient anxiety about the recovery process, enable assignment of outcome in patients lost to follow-up, and provide earlier and more readily available options for clinical outcome assessment in adaptive design and proof of concept studies. We assessed whether day-7/10 functional outcome predicted day-90 functional outcome among acute ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: The NINDS-tPA Study database was analyzed. Global disability was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Spearman correlation evaluated the association of day-7/10 versus day-90 mRS, and observed agreement was computed using the weighted kappa agreement, both unadjusted and adjusted by multivariable ordinal logistic modeling for demographic and clinical variables known to influence stroke outcomes. RESULTS: 581 subjects (93%) were alive at 7-10 days. There was strong correlation between mRS score at day 7/10 and day 90 (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001), and the weighted kappa agreement was 0.82 (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, day-7/10 day mRS was independently and strongly associated with day-90 mRS, while among other baseline variables, only baseline NIH Stroke Scale score (per unit increase) and a history of congestive heart failure (CHF) were significantly associated with a worse day-90 mRS. CONCLUSIONS: Global disability status 1 week after an index ischemic stroke strongly predicts final 3-month disability outcome. Functioning at 1 week, supplemented by initial stroke severity and CHF history information, may provide an early outcome guide useful for patient and family counseling.
BACKGROUND: The time point generally recognized as most appropriate to assess final functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke is 3 months. However, identifying earlier reliable prognostic time points may allay patientanxiety about the recovery process, enable assignment of outcome in patients lost to follow-up, and provide earlier and more readily available options for clinical outcome assessment in adaptive design and proof of concept studies. We assessed whether day-7/10 functional outcome predicted day-90 functional outcome among acute ischemic strokepatients. METHODS: The NINDS-tPA Study database was analyzed. Global disability was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Spearman correlation evaluated the association of day-7/10 versus day-90 mRS, and observed agreement was computed using the weighted kappa agreement, both unadjusted and adjusted by multivariable ordinal logistic modeling for demographic and clinical variables known to influence stroke outcomes. RESULTS: 581 subjects (93%) were alive at 7-10 days. There was strong correlation between mRS score at day 7/10 and day 90 (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001), and the weighted kappa agreement was 0.82 (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, day-7/10 day mRS was independently and strongly associated with day-90 mRS, while among other baseline variables, only baseline NIH Stroke Scale score (per unit increase) and a history of congestive heart failure (CHF) were significantly associated with a worse day-90 mRS. CONCLUSIONS: Global disability status 1 week after an index ischemic stroke strongly predicts final 3-month disability outcome. Functioning at 1 week, supplemented by initial stroke severity and CHF history information, may provide an early outcome guide useful for patient and family counseling.
Authors: Michael J Lyerly; J Thomas Houston; Amelia K Boehme; Karen C Albright; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Paola Palazzo; Muhammed Alvi; Pawan V Rawal; Niren Kapoor; April Sisson; Anne W Alexandrov; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Liangfu Zhu; David S Liebeskind; Reza Jahan; Sidney Starkman; Noriko Salamon; Gary Duckwiler; Fernando Vinuela; Satoshi Tateshima; Nestor Gonzalez; Pablo Villablanca; Latisha K Ali; Doojin Kim; Bruce Ovbiagele; Michael Froehler; Matthew Tenser; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Phillip A Scott; Shirley M Frederiksen; John D Kalbfleisch; Zhenzhen Xu; William J Meurer; Angela F Caveney; Annette Sandretto; Ann B Holden; Mary N Haan; Ellen G Hoeffner; Sameer A Ansari; David P Lambert; Michael Jaggi; William G Barsan; Robert Silbergleit Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: D Behme; A Mpotsaris; P Zeyen; M N Psychogios; A Kowoll; C J Maurer; F Joachimski; J Liman; K Wasser; C Kabbasch; A Berlis; M Knauth; T Liebig; W Weber Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Amelia K Boehme; James E Siegler; Michael T Mullen; Karen C Albright; Michael J Lyerly; Dominique J Monlezun; Erica M Jones; Rikki Tanner; Nicole R Gonzales; T Mark Beasley; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz; Sheryl Martin-Schild Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Shadi Yaghi; Joshua Z Willey; Howard Andrews; Amelia K Boehme; Randolph S Marshall; Bernadette Boden-Albala Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2016-04-05