Literature DB >> 19893195

The relative effectiveness of different stimulus waveforms in evoking VEMPs: significance of stimulus energy and frequency.

Sally M Rosengren1, Sendhil Govender, James G Colebatch.   

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of a series of different sound stimulus waveforms in evoking VEMPs in normal volunteers. The waveforms were clicks (0.1-0.8 ms), biphasic clicks (0.8 ms) and sine waves (1250 Hz, 0.8 ms and 500 Hz, 2 ms) with different peak intensity and duration but similar root mean square area. VEMP amplitudes varied widely (corrected values 0.35 to 1.06), but when the amplitudes were plotted against the physical energy content and A-weighted intensity (L(Aeq): a measure of acoustic energy) of the waveforms, the relationship was found to be highly linear. However, when the stimuli were matched for their A-weighted energy, a 500 Hz 2 ms sine wave was the most effective waveform, suggesting that frequency tuning in the vestibular system is also an important factor. VEMP amplitude is thus determined by three stimulus-related factors: physical energy, transmission through the middle ear and vestibular frequency tuning. Use of a 500 Hz stimulus will maximise the prevalence and amplitude of the VEMP for a given sound exposure level.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19893195     DOI: 10.3233/VES-2009-0345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  15 in total

1.  [Recording cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Part 2: influencing factors, evaluation of findings and clinical significance].

Authors:  L E Walther; K Hörmann; O Pfaar
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Vestibular Evoked Myographic Correlation.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-12

3.  Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther; Mario Cebulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.

Authors:  Amanda I Rodriguez; Megan L A Thomas; Denis Fitzpatrick; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.

Authors:  Amanda I Rodriguez; Megan L A Thomas; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Short tone bursts are better than clicks for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in clinical practice.

Authors:  David Viciana; Jose A Lopez-Escamez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  How to interpret latencies of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials: Our experience in fifty-three participants.

Authors:  C Li; M G Zuniga; K D Nguyen; J P Carey; Y Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  The role of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in the assessment of patients with vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Elodie Chiarovano; Cynthia Darlington; Pierre-Paul Vidal; Georges Lamas; Catherine de Waele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Current diagnostic procedures for diagnosing vertigo and dizziness.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

10.  Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation.

Authors:  Danielle L Dennis; Sendhil Govender; Peggy Chen; Neil P McAngus Todd; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.