Literature DB >> 19893101

Overweight in trained subjects - are we looking at wrong numbers? (Body mass index compared with body fat percentage in estimating overweight in athletes.).

Sanja Mazic1, Marina Djelic, Jelena Suzic, Slavica Suzic, Milica Dekleva, Dragan Radovanovic, Ljiljana Scepanovic, Vesna Starcevic.   

Abstract

Body mass index (BMI) is widely used as an index of obesity in adults. In trained population, individual with low body fat could be classified as overweight by BMI. To evaluate this problem, the purposes of this study were to determine the BMI and body fat percentage (BF%) of trained and untrained subjects and to evaluate the accuracy of BMI classification (> or =25 kg.m(-2)) as a prediction of overweight/obesity in trained subjects. The total number of 299 trained (basketball players) and 179 untrained male subjects participated in this study. Body height and body mass were measured; BMI was calculated for all subjects. BF% was determined via Tanita bioimpedance body composition analyzer. BMI >or = 25 kg.m(-2) and BF% > 20% were used to define overweight. There was no significant age differences. Body mass, height (p < 0.01) and BMI (p < 0.05) were significantly higher, although BF% was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in trained group when compared to untrained. Eighty-five trained subjects had a BMI of 25 or higher, indicating overweight. Of these, only three individuls had excess BF%. The results of the present study suggest that a BMI > or = 25 kg.m(-2) is not an accurate predictor of overweight in trained subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19893101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Physiol Biophys        ISSN: 0231-5882            Impact factor:   1.512


  5 in total

1.  Heart rate variability characteristics in a large group of active-duty marines and relationship to posttraumatic stress.

Authors:  Arpi Minassian; Mark A Geyer; Dewleen G Baker; Caroline M Nievergelt; Daniel T O'Connor; Victoria B Risbrough
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Sex Differences in Anthropometric and Physiological Profiles of Hungarian Rowers of Different Ages.

Authors:  Robert Podstawski; Krzysztof Borysławski; Zsolt Bálint Katona; Zoltan Alföldi; Michał Boraczyński; Jarosław Jaszczur-Nowicki; Piotr Gronek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Relationship between the percentage of body fat and surrogate indices of fatness in male and female Polish active and sedentary students.

Authors:  Grażyna Lutoslawska; Marzena Malara; Paweł Tomaszewski; Krzysztof Mazurek; Anna Czajkowska; Anna Kęska; Joanna Tkaczyk
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Musculoskeletal pain and limitations in work ability in Swedish marines: a cross-sectional survey of prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Andreas Monnier; Helena Larsson; Mats Djupsjöbacka; Lars-Åke Brodin; Björn O Äng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Dietary Intake of Adults Who Participate in CrossFit® Exercise Regimens.

Authors:  Regis C Pearson; Nathan T Jenkins
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.