Literature DB >> 19893055

An industry perspective on the utility of short-term carcinogenicity testing in transgenic mice in pharmaceutical development.

Richard D Storer1, Frank D Sistare, M Vijayaraj Reddy, Joseph J DeGeorge.   

Abstract

International guidelines allow for use of a short-term cancer bioassay (twenty-six weeks) in transgenic mice as a substitute for one of the two required long-term rodent bioassays in the preclinical safety evaluation of pharmaceuticals. The two models that have gained the widest acceptance by sponsors and regulatory authorities are the CB6F1-RasH2 mouse hemizygous for a human H-ras transgene and the B6.129N5-Trp53 mouse heterozygous for a p53 null allele. The p53(+/-) model is of particular value for compounds with residual concern that genotoxic activity may contribute to tumorigenesis. The rasH2 model is an appropriate alternative without regard to evidence of genotoxic potential. Since results from a short-term bioassay can be obtained relatively early in drug development, there is the potential for more timely assessment of cancer risk for individuals in long-term clinical trials. Use of these models in preclinical safety evaluation also significantly reduces animal use, time, and manpower. Preliminary findings indicate that prediction of two-year rat bioassay outcomes based on data from chronic rat toxicity studies, together with early assessment of carcinogenic potential in short-term transgenic models, may have the potential to increase the timeliness and efficiency of strategies for the identification of human carcinogenic hazards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19893055     DOI: 10.1177/0192623309351718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  5 in total

Review 1.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  40 Years of RAS-A Historic Overview.

Authors:  Alberto Fernández-Medarde; Javier De Las Rivas; Eugenio Santos
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 2: examples.

Authors:  Robert A Ettlin; Junji Kuroda; Stephanie Plassmann; Makoto Hayashi; David E Prentice
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.628

4.  Detection of the onset of ischemia and carcinogenesis by hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-based in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kadonosono; Takahiro Kuchimaru; Shuichi Yamada; Yumi Takahashi; Atsushi Murakami; Taeko Tani; Hitomi Watanabe; Tomoharu Tanaka; Kiichi Hirota; Masahiro Inoue; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Takeshi Toyoda; Koji Urano; Kazuhiko Machida; Tomoo Eto; Tomoyuki Ogura; Hideki Tsutsumi; Mamoru Ito; Masahiro Hiraoka; Gen Kondoh; Shinae Kizaka-Kondoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  rasH2 mouse: reproducibility and stability of carcinogenicity due to a standardized production and monitoring system.

Authors:  Hideki Tsutsumi; Ryo Inoue; Masahiko Yasuda; Riichi Takahashi; Masami Suzuki; Koji Urano
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.