Literature DB >> 19892607

The rad52-Y66A allele alters the choice of donor template during spontaneous chromosomal recombination.

Adriana Antúnez de Mayolo1, Ivana Sunjevaric, Robert Reid, Uffe H Mortensen, Rodney Rothstein, Michael Lisby.   

Abstract

Spontaneous mitotic recombination is a potential source of genetic changes such as loss of heterozygosity and chromosome translocations, which may lead to genetic disease. In this study we have used a rad52 hyper-recombination mutant, rad52-Y66A, to investigate the process of spontaneous heteroallelic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that spontaneous recombination has different genetic requirements, depending on whether the recombination event occurs between chromosomes or between chromosome and plasmid sequences. The hyper-recombination phenotype of the rad52-Y66A mutation is epistatic with deletion of MRE11, which is required for establishment of DNA damage-induced cohesion. Moreover, single-cell analysis of strains expressing YFP-tagged Rad52-Y66A reveals a close to wild-type frequency of focus formation, but with foci lasting 6 times longer. This result suggests that spontaneous DNA lesions that require recombinational repair occur at the same frequency in wild-type and rad52-Y66A cells, but that the recombination process is slow in rad52-Y66A cells. Taken together, we propose that the slow recombinational DNA repair in the rad52-Y66A mutant leads to a by-pass of the window-of-opportunity for sister chromatid recombination normally promoted by MRE11-dependent damage-induced cohesion thereby causing a shift towards interchromosomal recombination. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19892607      PMCID: PMC2818265          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  71 in total

1.  Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products.

Authors:  A Aguilera; H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair.

Authors:  J A Nickoloff; J D Singer; M F Hoekstra; F Heffron
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B L Ray; C I White; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Spencer; S L Gerring; C Connelly; P Hieter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The RAD50 gene, a member of the double strand break repair epistasis group, is not required for spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast.

Authors:  R E Malone; T Ward; S Lin; J Waring
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation.

Authors:  N Sugawara; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Time of replication of ARS elements along yeast chromosome III.

Authors:  A E Reynolds; R M McCarroll; C S Newlon; W L Fangman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R H Borts; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Protein affinity chromatography with purified yeast DNA polymerase alpha detects proteins that bind to DNA polymerase.

Authors:  J Miles; T Formosa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C I White; J E Haber
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  RSC facilitates Rad59-dependent homologous recombination between sister chromatids by promoting cohesin loading at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Oum; Changhyun Seong; Youngho Kwon; Jae-Hoon Ji; Amy Sid; Sreejith Ramakrishnan; Grzegorz Ira; Anna Malkova; Patrick Sung; Sang Eun Lee; Eun Yong Shim
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis.

Authors:  Tamara Goldfarb; Michael Lichten
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Enhancement of gene targeting in human cells by intranuclear permeation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52 protein.

Authors:  Arjun Kalvala; Giuseppe Rainaldi; Cristina Di Primio; Vania Liverani; Arturo Falaschi; Alvaro Galli
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Histone H3K56 acetylation, Rad52, and non-DNA repair factors control double-strand break repair choice with the sister chromatid.

Authors:  Sandra Muñoz-Galván; Sonia Jimeno; Rodney Rothstein; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Rad52 sumoylation prevents the toxicity of unproductive Rad51 filaments independently of the anti-recombinase Srs2.

Authors:  Aline Esta; Emilie Ma; Pauline Dupaigne; Laurent Maloisel; Raphaël Guerois; Eric Le Cam; Xavier Veaute; Eric Coïc
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.