BACKGROUND: Spontaneous epidural hematoma is a rare condition, which usually requires urgent surgical treatment. OBJECTIVES: To report two cases of spontaneous epidural hematoma, one of which was treated conservatively, and the other surgically, and discuss the possibility of unusual spontaneous recovery and treatment decision-making. CASE REPORT: We encountered 2 patients with spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma, both of whom were taking an anti-platelet agent, producing severe paraplegia. One patient with a hematoma at C2-T3 experienced a rapid neurological recovery while a magnetic resonance imaging scan was being performed. A complete resolution of the hematoma and complete neurological recovery ensued without surgical intervention. A second patient with a hematoma at T10-12 showed no neurological recovery up to the time emergency surgery started and was treated surgically by T10-12 laminectomy and excision of the hematoma. Neurological function returned to normal in both patients. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of spontaneous recovery in some patients makes the decision for surgery difficult. Emergency physicians need to be aware of the possibility of spontaneous rapid neurological recovery in patients with spinal epidural hematoma. To avoid unnecessary surgery in patients who will spontaneously have neurological recovery, neurological evaluations need to be repeatedly performed up to the time the emergency surgery begins. However, unfortunately, there is no diagnostic tool at present to identify the patients who recover spontaneously, and the interval between onset and surgery is correlated with clinical results, therefore, conservative treatment should be prescribed only for those patients who exhibit improving neurological signs early in the clinical course.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous epidural hematoma is a rare condition, which usually requires urgent surgical treatment. OBJECTIVES: To report two cases of spontaneous epidural hematoma, one of which was treated conservatively, and the other surgically, and discuss the possibility of unusual spontaneous recovery and treatment decision-making. CASE REPORT: We encountered 2 patients with spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma, both of whom were taking an anti-platelet agent, producing severe paraplegia. One patient with a hematoma at C2-T3 experienced a rapid neurological recovery while a magnetic resonance imaging scan was being performed. A complete resolution of the hematoma and complete neurological recovery ensued without surgical intervention. A second patient with a hematoma at T10-12 showed no neurological recovery up to the time emergency surgery started and was treated surgically by T10-12 laminectomy and excision of the hematoma. Neurological function returned to normal in both patients. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of spontaneous recovery in some patients makes the decision for surgery difficult. Emergency physicians need to be aware of the possibility of spontaneous rapid neurological recovery in patients with spinal epidural hematoma. To avoid unnecessary surgery in patients who will spontaneously have neurological recovery, neurological evaluations need to be repeatedly performed up to the time the emergency surgery begins. However, unfortunately, there is no diagnostic tool at present to identify the patients who recover spontaneously, and the interval between onset and surgery is correlated with clinical results, therefore, conservative treatment should be prescribed only for those patients who exhibit improving neurological signs early in the clinical course.