Literature DB >> 19892063

Comparison of safety of subcutaneous enoxaparin as outpatient anticoagulation bridging therapy in patients with a mechanical heart valve versus patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Hien Thuy Bui1, Ashok Krisnaswami, Chieu-Uyen Le, James Chan, Bach-Nga Shenoy.   

Abstract

Patients with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) are at a higher risk for thromboembolic events than patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This difference is observed in the higher maintenance international normalized ratio (INR) range for patients with MHV and in the selection for anticoagulation bridge therapy when warfarin is interrupted perioperatively. However, once the decision is made to "bridge," the same therapeutic options, unfractionated heparin and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), are applicable to the 2 patient populations. Unfractionated heparin requires extended hospitalization and is often not selected. A paucity of published data exist establishing the efficacy and safety of LMWH as a bridging agent. The aim of this study was to describe a single-center experience and to provide data supporting the use of enoxaparin as a bridging agent. The study assessed whether patients with MHV undergoing bridging for a variety of procedures had higher thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk compared to patients with nonvalvular AF. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 173 patients (with MHV and AF) who underwent 230 bridging episodes with an LMWH, enoxaparin, from February 2002 through September 2007. Main outcome measurements were the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events within 2 months after the procedure. Of total bridging episodes, 130 episodes met the inclusion criteria; 62 episodes occurred in the MHV population and 68 episodes occurred in the AF population. The procedures varied from minor invasive procedures to major surgeries. There were no deaths or thromboembolic events. Major and minor bleeding rates were similar between the MHV and AF groups (3.2% and 2.9%, 14.5% and 13.2% respectively, p = NS). The major bleeding rate was similar to published data on bridging therapy. Most bleeding episodes (73%) occurred within 7 days after the procedure. In conclusion, our study provided actual outpatient anticoagulation clinical data on using LMWH as an option for periprocedural bridging anticoagulation in patients with MHV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19892063     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  James D Douketis; Alex C Spyropoulos; Frederick A Spencer; Michael Mayr; Amir K Jaffer; Mark H Eckman; Andrew S Dunn; Regina Kunz
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Strategies and outcomes of periprocedural bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Schulman; Ammar Majeed; Eva Mattsson; Sam Schulman; Margareta Holmström; Anna Ågren
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  [Perioperative antocoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves: recommendations].

Authors:  D Wendt; J A Piotrowski; B Schönfelder; G Marggraf; M Thielmann; H Jakob
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Safety and cost-effectiveness of bridge therapies for invasive dental procedures in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Authors:  Ki-Bum Won; Seung-Hyun Lee; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Chi-Young Shim; Gue-Ru Hong; Jong-Won Ha; Namsik Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.759

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.