Literature DB >> 19892062

Comparison of cardiac computed tomographic angiography to transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of patients with native valvular heart disease.

Troy M LaBounty1, Sidney Glasofer, Richard B Devereux, Fay Y Lin, Jonathan W Weinsaft, James K Min.   

Abstract

Retrospectively gated helical cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has been reported accurate in the evaluation of isolated valvular abnormalities, but its ability to provide comprehensive assessment of common valvular lesions is not established. We evaluated 56 consecutive patients undergoing 64-detector retrospective electrocardiogram-gated CCTA and transesophageal echocardiography for the presence of aortic and mitral stenoses, aortic and mitral regurgitations, mitral valve prolapse, and tricuspid regurgitation. Two cardiac computed tomographic angiographic readers measured maximum aortic and mitral valve opening areas, assessed for aortic or mitral valve regurgitant area, and evaluated for mitral valve prolapse. Tricuspid regurgitation was assessed by the contrast ratio of the inferior vena cava to the right heart. After excluding nondiagnostic valves on CCTA (mitral valve n = 4, aortic valve n = 2), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of CCTA compared to transesophageal echocardiography were 100%, 96%, 50%, and 100% for aortic stenosis, 44%, 96%, 67%, and 90% for aortic regurgitation, 100% each for mitral stenosis, 13%, 95%, 80%, and 45% for mitral regurgitation, and 50%, 98%, 80%, and 91% for mitral valve prolapse. There was no relation between tricuspid regurgitation grade and contrast ratio (p = 0.53). There was excellent interobserver agreement for aortic and mitral stenoses (kappa = 1.0 for each), and good agreement for aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, and mitral valve prolapse (kappa = 0.81, 0.78, and 0.88, respectively). In conclusion, CCTA exhibited high diagnostic performance for detection of aortic and mitral stenoses and limited diagnostic performance for aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, and mitral valve prolapse; tricuspid regurgitation could not be evaluated. The ability of CCTA to provide comprehensive assessment of valvular function is variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19892062     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anomalous origination of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus.

Authors:  Joanna C E Lim; Andy Beale; Steve Ramcharitar
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Cardiac imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  W S Choo; R P Steeds
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A step toward hemodynamic assessment with CT angiography.

Authors:  Daniel W Groves; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-01-20

4.  Assessment of mitral valve disease: a review of imaging modalities.

Authors:  Shweta R Motiwala; Francesca N Delling
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

5.  Imaging of cardiac valves by computed tomography.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-12-29

Review 6.  Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Hwan Seok Yong; Sung Mok Kim; Jeong A Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Yoo Jin Hong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.