Literature DB >> 19891279

Targeting low HDL-cholesterol to decrease residual cardiovascular risk in the managed care setting.

Mark J Cziraky1, Karol E Watson, Robert L Talbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most clinicians recognize the importance of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and, therefore, address this therapeutic need to decrease cardiovascular disease risk. In addition to the critical role that LDL-C plays, recent studies have shown the contribution of other lipid fractions, such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG), to overall cardiovascular health. Managed care initiatives to reduce cardiovascular risk typically focus on highly effective statin therapies, which are primarily LDL-C-lowering agents and have lesser TG-lowering and HDL-C-raising effects. However, clinical and epidemiologic data illustrate the need to expand the scope of therapies to reduce the residual cardiovascular risk associated with low HDL-C levels and elevated TG levels, even when LDL-C is managed successfully.
OBJECTIVE: To address the value of treating beyond LDL-C level to improve patient health outcomes and reduce health care-related costs.
SUMMARY: Several large trials and meta-analyses have investigated the effects of lipid-lowering statin therapy and have consistently demonstrated that statin therapy significantly reduces LDL-C levels and incidence of cardiovascular events. In spite of the efficacy of statin therapy in these studies, statins did not eliminate cardiovascular risk. Rather, significant residual cardiovascular risk remains after treatment with statins, especially in high-risk patients such as those with diabetes. Residual cardiovascular risk stems, at least partially, from low HDL-C and elevated TG. Low HDL-C levels have been identified as a significant, independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, and increases in HDL-C are associated with reductions in cardiovascular events. High TG levels are a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and are a marker for atherogenic remnant lipo-proteins, such as very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C). Additionally, with elevated TG levels, a combination of LDL-C with VLDL-C in the measure of non-HDL-C may be a better predictor of cardiovascular risk than LDL-C alone. Recent national treatment guidelines suggest that combination therapy may be necessary to address multiple lipid targets (i.e., LDL-C, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, and TG); adding niacin or a fibrate to a statin is a therapeutic option that should be considered. As monotherapy agents, fibrates and niacin have been demonstrated to alter several lipid parameters and reduce cardiovascular events. Niacin appears to exert the greatest beneficial effects on the widest range of lipoprotein abnormalities, in addition to possessing an established safety profile. Moreover, niacin/statin combination therapy may provide greater benefits, as manifested through a correction of atherogenic lipid abnormalities, a slowing of atherosclerosis progression in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, and a reduction of residual cardiovascular risk. Pharmacoeconomic modeling studies have been used to describe the potential effects on both cardiovascular events and health care costs by the achievement of, or failure to achieve, combined optimal lipid values (OLVs). Achievement of OLVs is predicted to be associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events, in which greater magnitudes of risk reduction accompany the achievement of a greater number of lipid goals. Based on patient baseline lipid values and product labeling information, mathematical models estimate that OLVs are achieved more frequently with extended-release niacin (niacin ER)/simvastatin combination therapy than with other high-potency agents. These modeling estimates were maintained in different patient groups, including those with diabetes or the metabolic syndrome. Finally, these modeling studies estimated that a fixed-dose niacin ER/simvastatin combination therapy would reduce direct medical costs of CHD events more effectively than would high-dose simvastatin monotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Statins are highly effective for lowering LDL-C levels and, consequently, cardiovascular event rates. However, statins do not eliminate cardiovascular risk. Even in the presence of tightly controlled LDL-C levels, evidence indicates that high TG and low HDL-C levels are independent cardiovascular risk factors. Treating lipid parameters beyond LDL-C may require the addition of niacin or a fibrate to statin therapy. Niacin is the most effective agent for raising HDL-C levels, and pharmacoeconomic modeling suggests that niacin ER/statin combination therapy may promote the cost-effective achievement of OLVs in several at-risk patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19891279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  26 in total

1.  The effects of sulfonylureas plus metformin on lipids, blood pressure, and adverse events in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao Xiang; Yunzhou Fan; Tsend-Ayush Ganchuluun; Wenhua Kong; Qian Ouyang; Jingwen Sun; Beibei Cao; Hongbo Jiang; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Impact of red blood cells count on the relationship between high density lipoproteins and the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease: a single centre study [corrected].

Authors:  Alon Schaffer; Monica Verdoia; Ettore Cassetti; Lucia Barbieri; Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Paolo Marino; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  A pooled analysis of the association of isolated low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with cardiovascular mortality in Japan.

Authors:  Takumi Hirata; Daisuke Sugiyama; Shin-Ya Nagasawa; Yoshitaka Murakami; Shigeyuki Saitoh; Akira Okayama; Hiroyasu Iso; Fujiko Irie; Toshimi Sairenchi; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Michiko Yamada; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Katsuyuki Miura; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Tomonori Okamura
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Lipoprotein Biomarkers and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paramjit K Sandhu; Salma M A Musaad; Alan T Remaley; Stephanie S Buehler; Sonya Strider; James H Derzon; Hubert W Vesper; Anne Ranne; Colleen S Shaw; Robert H Christenson
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2016-08-01

5.  High density lipoproteins and type 2 diabetes: Emerging concepts in their relationship.

Authors:  Michael S Kostapanos; Moses S Elisaf
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2014-02-20

6.  An analysis of the risk factors for premature coronary artery disease in young and middle-age Chinese patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Jingjin Che; Guangping Li; Yuanxia Shao; Haifang Niu; Yanli Shi
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013

7.  Characteristics of subjects with very low serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk for intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jae-Geun Lee; Sung Joo Koh; So Yeon Yoo; Jung Re Yu; Sang Ah Lee; Gwanpyo Koh; Daeho Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 8.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Study Makes High-Density Lipoprotein a Biomarker for Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.

Authors:  Chiz-Tzung Chang; Chao-Yuh Yang; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Shih-Yi Lin; Chao-Jung Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Value of C-reactive protein as a risk factor for acute coronary syndrome: a comparison with apolipoprotein concentrations and lipid profile.

Authors:  Magdalena Krintus; Marek Kozinski; Anna Stefanska; Marcin Sawicki; Karolina Obonska; Tomasz Fabiszak; Jacek Kubica; Grazyna Sypniewska
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.711

10.  Pharmacological primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention among diabetic patients in a multiethnic general practice population: still room for improvements.

Authors:  Anh T Tran; Jørund Straand; Ingvild Dalen; Kåre I Birkeland; Tor Claudi; John G Cooper; Haakon E Meyer; Anne K Jenum
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.