OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of abduction and external rotation (ABER) positioning performed before image acquisition on the assessment of rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff tears underwent an initial CT arthrogram of the shoulder in neutral position, immediately followed by temporary ABER positioning, before a second CT acquisition in neutral position. Two observers blinded to potential pre-procedure ABER positioning independently analysed the randomly distributed images. Lesions were classified into partial-thickness (PT) and full-thickness (FT) tear subtypes. Lesion detection and measurements of pre- and post-ABER studies were compared. RESULTS: We found no influence of pre-test ABER positioning on FT detection or measurements. Every PT detected on pre-ABER study was also detected on post-ABER study (28/28 for reader 1, and 32/32 for reader 2). Seven and eight additional PT were found by readers 1 and 2, respectively, on post-ABER study. Lesion size increased after ABER in terms of area (P < 0.001 for both readers) and Ellman's grade (P = 0.02 and 0.002 for reader 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: ABER positioning before CT is associated with improved delineation of partial tears, a higher number of detected tears and modification of treatment planning.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of abduction and external rotation (ABER) positioning performed before image acquisition on the assessment of rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff tears underwent an initial CT arthrogram of the shoulder in neutral position, immediately followed by temporary ABER positioning, before a second CT acquisition in neutral position. Two observers blinded to potential pre-procedure ABER positioning independently analysed the randomly distributed images. Lesions were classified into partial-thickness (PT) and full-thickness (FT) tear subtypes. Lesion detection and measurements of pre- and post-ABER studies were compared. RESULTS: We found no influence of pre-test ABER positioning on FT detection or measurements. Every PT detected on pre-ABER study was also detected on post-ABER study (28/28 for reader 1, and 32/32 for reader 2). Seven and eight additional PT were found by readers 1 and 2, respectively, on post-ABER study. Lesion size increased after ABER in terms of area (P < 0.001 for both readers) and Ellman's grade (P = 0.02 and 0.002 for reader 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: ABER positioning before CT is associated with improved delineation of partial tears, a higher number of detected tears and modification of treatment planning.
Authors: Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2003-09-26 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Augustus D Mazzocca; Lina M Rincon; Robert W O'Connor; Elifho Obopilwe; Matthew Andersen; Lauren Geaney; Robert A Arciero Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Se Jin Ahn; Sung Hwan Hong; Jee Won Chai; Ja-Young Choi; Hye Jin Yoo; Sae Hoon Kim; Heung Sik Kang Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 3.500