INTRODUCTION: Concomitant psychotropic medication (CPM) treatment is common in persons with major depression (MDD). However, relationships with patient characteristics and response to treatment are unclear. METHODS: Participants with nonpsychotic MDD (N=2682) were treated with citalopram, 20-60 mg/day. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment outcome characteristics were compared between those using CPMs at study entry or during up to 14 weeks of citalopram treatment, and non-users. RESULTS: About 35% of participants used a CPM. Insomnia was the predominant indication (70.3%). CPM users were more likely to be seen in primary care settings (69.3% versus 30.7%), be white, of non-Hispanic ethnicity, married, and have a higher income, private insurance, and certain comorbid disorders. CPM users had greater depressive severity, poorer physical and mental functioning, and poorer quality of life than non-users. Response and remission rates were also lower. CPM users were more likely to achieve >50 mg/day of citalopram, to report greater side effect intensity, and to have serious adverse events, but less likely to be intolerant of citalopram. CONCLUSION: CPMs are associated with greater illness burden, more Axis I comorbidities (especially anxiety disorders), and lower treatment effectiveness. This suggests that CPM use may identify a more difficult to treat population that needs more aggressive treatment.
INTRODUCTION: Concomitant psychotropic medication (CPM) treatment is common in persons with major depression (MDD). However, relationships with patient characteristics and response to treatment are unclear. METHODS:Participants with nonpsychotic MDD (N=2682) were treated with citalopram, 20-60 mg/day. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment outcome characteristics were compared between those using CPMs at study entry or during up to 14 weeks of citalopram treatment, and non-users. RESULTS: About 35% of participants used a CPM. Insomnia was the predominant indication (70.3%). CPM users were more likely to be seen in primary care settings (69.3% versus 30.7%), be white, of non-Hispanic ethnicity, married, and have a higher income, private insurance, and certain comorbid disorders. CPM users had greater depressive severity, poorer physical and mental functioning, and poorer quality of life than non-users. Response and remission rates were also lower. CPM users were more likely to achieve >50 mg/day of citalopram, to report greater side effect intensity, and to have serious adverse events, but less likely to be intolerant of citalopram. CONCLUSION: CPMs are associated with greater illness burden, more Axis I comorbidities (especially anxiety disorders), and lower treatment effectiveness. This suggests that CPM use may identify a more difficult to treat population that needs more aggressive treatment.
Authors: Ranran Li; Renrong Wu; Jun Chen; David E Kemp; Ming Ren; Carla Conroy; Philip Chan; Mary Beth Serrano; Stephen J Ganocy; Joseph R Calabrese; Keming Gao Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2016-03-01
Authors: Ian Joel; Amy E Begley; Benoit H Mulsant; Eric J Lenze; Sati Mazumdar; Mary Amanda Dew; Daniel Blumberger; Meryl Butters; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Caitlyn T Solem; Ahmed Shelbaya; Yin Wan; Chinmay G Deshpande; Jose Alvir; Elizabeth Pappadopulos Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 2.570