Literature DB >> 19889698

Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naive bird predators to aposematic prey.

Alice Exnerová1, Katerina Hotová Svádová, Eva Fucíková, Pieter Drent, Pavel Stys.   

Abstract

Variation in reactions to aposematic prey is common among conspecific individuals of bird predators. It may result from different individual experience but it also exists among naive birds. This variation may possibly be explained by the effect of personality--a complex of correlated, heritable behavioural traits consistent across contexts. In the great tit (Parus major), two extreme personality types have been defined. 'Fast' explorers are bold, aggressive and routine-forming; 'slow' explorers are shy, non-aggressive and innovative. Influence of personality type on unlearned reaction to aposematic prey, rate of avoidance learning and memory were tested in naive, hand-reared great tits from two opposite lines selected for exploration (slow against fast). The birds were subjected to a sequence of trials in which they were offered aposematic adult firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus). Slow birds showed a greater degree of unlearned wariness and learned to avoid the firebugs faster than fast birds. Although birds of both personality types remembered their experience, slow birds were more cautious in the memory test. We conclude that not only different species but also populations of predators that differ in proportions of personality types may have different impacts on survival of aposematic insects under natural conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889698      PMCID: PMC2842751          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities.

Authors:  Kees van Oers; Piet J Drent; Piet de Goede; Arie J van Noordwijk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  A genetic analysis of avian personality traits: correlated, response to artificial selection.

Authors:  Kees van Oers; Gerdien de Jong; Piet J Drent; Arie J van Noordwijk
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Realized heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Pieter J Drent; Kees van Oers; Arie J van Noordwijk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Habitat stability and predation pressure affect temperament behaviours in populations of three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Nichola M Brydges; Nick Colegrave; Robert J P Heathcote; Victoria A Braithwaite
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Association between DRD4 gene polymorphism and personality variation in great tits: a test across four wild populations.

Authors:  Peter Korsten; Jakob C Mueller; Christine Hermannstädter; Karen M Bouwman; Niels J Dingemanse; Piet J Drent; Miriam Liedvogel; Erik Matthysen; Kees van Oers; Thijs van Overveld; Samantha C Patrick; John L Quinn; Ben C Sheldon; Joost M Tinbergen; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Parental prey selection affects risk-taking behaviour and spatial learning in avian offspring.

Authors:  Kathryn E Arnold; Scot L Ramsay; Christine Donaldson; Aileen Adam
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Fecal corticosteroids in a territorial bird selected for different personalities: daily rhythm and the response to social stress.

Authors:  C Carere; T G G Groothuis; E Möstl; S Daan; J M Koolhaas
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Birds reveal their personality when singing.

Authors:  László Zsolt Garamszegi; Marcel Eens; János Török
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sex and boldness explain individual differences in spatial learning in a lizard.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Daniel W A Noble; Dani Chandrasoma; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Personality, foraging behavior and specialization: integrating behavioral and food web ecology at the individual level.

Authors:  Benjamin J Toscano; Natasha J Gownaris; Sarah M Heerhartz; Cristián J Monaco
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Ontogenetic immune challenges shape adult personality in mallard ducks.

Authors:  Michael W Butler; Matthew B Toomey; Kevin J McGraw; Melissah Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sometimes slower is better: slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task.

Authors:  Lauren M Guillette; Adam R Reddon; Marisa Hoeschele; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Predator and prey activity levels jointly influence the outcome of long-term foraging bouts.

Authors:  Kayla Sweeney; Brian Cusack; Fawn Armagost; Timothy O'Brien; Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Npas4a expression in the teleost forebrain is associated with stress coping style differences in fear learning.

Authors:  Matthew R Baker; Ryan Y Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A selfish genetic element influencing longevity correlates with reactive behavioural traits in female house mice (Mus domesticus).

Authors:  Yannick Auclair; Barbara König; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Body size but not warning signal luminance influences predation risk in recently metamorphosed poison frogs.

Authors:  Eric E Flores; Martin Stevens; Allen J Moore; Hannah M Rowland; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.