BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the gold standard in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). However, the optimal salvage regimen has not yet been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of MINE (mesna, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide) alternated with ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) in the treatment of 61 relapsed or refractory HL patients after ABVD-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients (41%) achieved a complete response (CR), 23 (38%) a partial response (PR), 4 (7%) a stable disease, and 8 (13%) progressed for an overall response rate of 79%. Response to first-line chemotherapy was the most important prognostic factor for response to MINE-ESHAP (P = 0.041). No grade 4 extrahematologic toxic effects or toxic deaths were observed. Adequate peripheral blood stem-cell collection was achieved in 56 of 59 (95%) mobilized patients. Overall survival and event-free survival after HDT and ASCT were significantly higher for patients achieving CR/PR in comparison with those refractory to MINE-ESHAP (46% and 35% versus 74% and 69%, respectively). CONCLUSION: MINE-ESHAP results in a high response rate with acceptable toxicity in patients with HL having failed ABVD-based treatment.
BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the gold standard in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). However, the optimal salvage regimen has not yet been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of MINE (mesna, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide) alternated with ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) in the treatment of 61 relapsed or refractory HL patients after ABVD-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients (41%) achieved a complete response (CR), 23 (38%) a partial response (PR), 4 (7%) a stable disease, and 8 (13%) progressed for an overall response rate of 79%. Response to first-line chemotherapy was the most important prognostic factor for response to MINE-ESHAP (P = 0.041). No grade 4 extrahematologic toxic effects or toxic deaths were observed. Adequate peripheral blood stem-cell collection was achieved in 56 of 59 (95%) mobilized patients. Overall survival and event-free survival after HDT and ASCT were significantly higher for patients achieving CR/PR in comparison with those refractory to MINE-ESHAP (46% and 35% versus 74% and 69%, respectively). CONCLUSION: MINE-ESHAP results in a high response rate with acceptable toxicity in patients with HL having failed ABVD-based treatment.
Authors: Maika Onishi; Solomon A Graf; Leona Holmberg; Sanaz Behnia; Andrei R Shustov; Karen Schiavo; Mary Philip; Edward N Libby; Ryan D Cassaday; John M Pagel; Jennifer E Roden; David G Maloney; Damian J Green; Brian G Till; Oliver W Press; Stephen D Smith; Ajay K Gopal Journal: Hematol Oncol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 5.271